Communication in e-learning courses. Students' experiences and their preferences for online or face-to-face communication

被引:0
|
作者
Paechter, Manuela [1 ]
Kreisler, Mareike [1 ]
Luttenberger, Silke [1 ]
Macher, Daniel [1 ]
Wimmer, Sigrid [1 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Graz, Austria
来源
关键词
E-Learning; Communication in e-learning; Achievements and enjoyment in e-learning; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11612-013-0223-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Altogether, 2,196 students from 29 Austrian universities took part in an empirical investigation on learning and communication in e-learning courses. The students completed a questionnaire on their experiences in an actual e-learning course, on their perceived learning achievements, and their enjoyment of the course. Furthermore, they expressed their preferences for online or face-to-face communication. All in all, students were satisfied with their course. They did not prefer one communication setting over another. They preferred online-communication for the distribution of information but advocated face-to-face communication when joint learning and cooperation are important or when socio-emotional relations are to be developed. The results of the study advocate blended-learning designs and give recommendations for which communication purposes online and for which face-to-face settings are more adequate.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 443
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Online or face-to-face? Students' experiences and preferences in e-learning
    Paechter, Manuela
    Maier, Brigitte
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (04): : 292 - 297
  • [2] Communication in e-learning courses. Students' experiences and their preferences for online or face-to-face communication [Kommunikation in E-Learning-Veranstaltungen. Erfahrungen der Studierenden und ihre Präferenzen für Online- oder Face-to-Face-Kommunikation]
    Paechter M.
    Kreisler M.
    Luttenberger S.
    Macher D.
    Wimmer S.
    [J]. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 2013, 44 (4): : 429 - 443
  • [3] E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students' Preferences and Behaviors
    Gherhes, Vasile
    Stoian, Claudia E.
    Farcasiu, Marcela Alina
    Stanici, Miroslav
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [4] Evaluating face-to-face and online flipped learning on performance and satisfaction in marketing and communication students
    Guevara-Otero, Niurka
    Cuevas-Molano, Elena
    Vargas-Perez, Ana M.
    Rivera, Maria Teresa Sanchez
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [5] Plant Science Instructors' Perceptions of Learning Experiences in Online and Face-to-face Courses
    Sellick, Sable A.
    Shoulders, Catherine W.
    Longer, David E.
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2015, 50 (09) : S24 - S24
  • [6] Comparison of Communication Patterns of Students in Online and Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning Environments with Discourse Analysis
    Mutlu-Bayraktar, Duygu
    Donmez, Nesrin Ozdener
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGIST, 2015, 22 (02): : 265 - 275
  • [7] Having it both ways: learning communication skills in face-to-face and online environments
    Eklund, Marja
    Isotalus, Pekka
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9
  • [8] Instruments to explore blended learning: Modifying a method to analyse online communication for the analysis of face-to-face communication
    de Leng, Bas A.
    Dolmans, Diana H. J. M.
    Donkers, H. H. L. M.
    Muijtjens, Arno M. M.
    van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 55 (02) : 644 - 651
  • [9] A comparison of students' preferences for face-to-face and online laboratory sessions: insights from students' perception of their learning experiences in an immunology course
    Png, Chin Wen
    Goh, Lih Ing
    Chen, Yuanxiang Kenneth
    Yeo, Huimin
    Liu, Haiyan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2024, 25 (02)
  • [10] Teaching qualitative data analysis software online: a comparison of face-to-face and e-learning ATLAS.ti courses
    Kalpokaite, Neringa
    Radivojevic, Ivana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & METHOD IN EDUCATION, 2020, 43 (03) : 296 - 310