Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS)

被引:24
|
作者
Basham, Elizabeth [1 ]
Stock, Laura [1 ]
Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina [1 ]
Mitchell, Christopher [1 ]
Gossett, Dana R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
关键词
obstetric anal sphincter injury; operative delivery; VAGINAL DELIVERY; RISK-FACTORS; SEVERE PERINEAL; RECURRENCE; TEARS; DISRUPTION; LACERATION; RUPTURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a5f98e
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To describe obstetric outcomes in women with a prior obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) and to identify risk factors for recurrence. Methods: A retrospective chart review of women who sustained an OASIS between November 2005 and March 2010 at a tertiary care hospital was performed to identify risk factors for recurrence. Results: One thousand six hundred twenty-nine patients had an OASIS. Of these, 758 patients (90%) subsequently delivered during the aforementioned timeframe; 685 patients had a subsequent vaginal delivery. Of the women, 3.2% had a recurrent OASIS. Recurrence was associated with larger birth weight (27% >= 4000 g vs 11.6% <4000 g; P = 0.04) and delivery mode (25.0%, 12.5%, and 2.7% for forceps-assisted, vacuum-assisted, and spontaneous deliveries, respectively (P = 0.0001)), whereas a history of fourth-degree laceration, prior wound complication, or episiotomy at subsequent delivery were not (P = 0.5, P = 0.5, and P = 0.4, respectively). Conclusions: Recurrent OASIS occurred in a small percentage of women (3.2%) who subsequently delivered vaginally. Recurrent OASIS was associated with operative vaginal delivery and birth weight 4000 g or greater. Neither episiotomy at first delivery nor at subsequent delivery conferred an increased recurrence risk.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 332
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS)
    Basham, Elizabeth
    Stock, Laura
    Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
    Mitchell, Christopher
    Gossett, Dana R.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2014, 69 (02) : 78 - 79
  • [2] Management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in subsequent pregnancy
    Evans, C.
    Archer, R.
    Forrest, A.
    Barrington, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 34 (06) : 486 - 488
  • [3] Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)
    Wali, S.
    Bhide, A.
    Khullar, V
    Fernando, R.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 53 - 53
  • [4] Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: The 'Oasis' in a New Obstetric Centre
    Yap, S.
    Sunanda, G.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 : 64 - 64
  • [5] Urinary incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)—is there a relationship?
    Inka Scheer
    Vasanth Andrews
    Ranee Thakar
    Abdul H. Sultan
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2008, 19 : 179 - 183
  • [6] Urinary incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)-is there a relationship?
    Scheer, Inka
    Andrews, Vasanth
    Thakar, Ranee
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (02) : 179 - 183
  • [7] THE IMPACT OF PREVIOUS PREGNANCY ON OBSTETRIC ANAL SPHINCTER INJURIES IN SUBSEQUENT BIRTH
    Thorne, E. P. C.
    McNab, J. R. W.
    Doumouchtsis, S. K.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2016, 35 : S138 - S139
  • [8] Underdiagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) at delivery
    Roper, J.
    Thakar, R.
    Sultan, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S46 - S47
  • [9] Mode of delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)-a reappraisal?
    Scheer, Inka
    Thakar, Ranee
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 (09) : 1095 - 1101
  • [10] Mode of delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)—a reappraisal?
    Inka Scheer
    Ranee Thakar
    Abdul H. Sultan
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2009, 20 : 1095 - 1101