Study of Major-Accident Risk Assessment Techniques in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process

被引:4
|
作者
Luis Fuentes-Bargues, Jose [1 ]
Jose Bastante-Ceca, Ma [1 ]
Sebastian Ferrer-Gisbert, Pablo [1 ]
Carmen Gonzalez-Cruz, Ma [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Proyectos Ingn, GIDDP, Camino Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
risks appreciation technique; environmental impact assessment; vulnerability of the project; major accidents; sustainable project management; project management; SUSTAINABLE OPERATIONS; METHODOLOGIES;
D O I
10.3390/su12145770
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Design, implementation, and operation of any project are affected by the environment where it is developed; at the same time, the project will influence the environment, since during its life cycle it can cause an impact on it. This impact can lead to social, economic, and environmental results. Directive 2014/52/EU, on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, reflects the obligation for the project promoter to consider, in the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the project, their vulnerability (exposure and resilience) to major accidents and/or disasters, evaluating both the risk and their effects on the environment, in case these major accidents and/or disasters appear. The IEC 31.010:2019 Risk management-Risk assessment techniques standard defines 45 risk appreciation techniques that are useful when analysing the risks, in general. The objective of this paper is to review these 45 techniques, and establish which ones can be used for the assessment of accidents or disasters required in the specific environmental impact assessment process to accomplish with the regulation. After the revision, the authors propose five risks appreciation techniques that could be used for the assessment of major accidents and or disasters in projects for which EIA has to be carried out.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk assessment within the control process of major accident hazards
    Amendola, A
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF CONVERTING CW FACILITIES TO PEACEFUL PURPOSES, 2002, 37 : 223 - 240
  • [2] Appropriate risk assessment methods for major accident establishments
    Carter, DA
    Hirst, IL
    Maddison, TE
    Porter, SR
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2003, 81 (B1) : 12 - 18
  • [3] Environmental impact assessment of major pedestrianization schemes through the use of modelling techniques
    Taxiltaris, C
    Basbas, S
    Nikolaou, K
    Tzevelekis, I
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2002, 11 (10A): : 800 - 805
  • [4] RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE EVALUATION OF TRITIUM ACCIDENT MITIGATION
    BRUSKE, SZ
    HOLLAND, DF
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY-FUSION, 1983, 4 (02): : 539 - 543
  • [5] Review of the major accident risk assessment and risk management system in Serbia
    Stojanovic, MB
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 1014 - 1019
  • [6] A "worst case" methodology for risk assessment of major accident installations
    Hirst, IL
    Carter, DA
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2000, 19 (02) : 78 - 85
  • [7] Benchmarking on the evaluation of major accident-related risk assessment
    Fabbri, Luciano
    Contini, Sergio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2009, 162 (2-3) : 1465 - 1476
  • [8] RISK ANALYSIS IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
    Zelenakova, Martina
    Zvijakova, Lenka
    Hlavata, Helena
    [J]. PUBLIC RECREATION AND LANDSCAPE PROTECTION - WITH NATURE HAND IN HAND?, 2017, 2017, : 317 - 322
  • [9] Integration of risk assessment into environmental impact assessment procedure - Case study for steel processing
    Robu, Brindusa
    Macoveanu, Mate
    [J]. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Vol A - Oral Presentations, Pts A and B, 2005, : A1262 - A1267
  • [10] Bioanalytical techniques used in environmental risk assessment
    van der Oost, Ron
    Beyer, Jonny
    Hamers, Timo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 88