Land Use Conflict Across the Airport Fence: Competing Urban Policy, Planning and Priority in Australia

被引:9
|
作者
Stevens, Nicholas [1 ]
Baker, Douglas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Fac Arts & Business, Maroochydore, Qld 4558, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Sci & Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Australia; airport privatisation; interfaces; land use planning; land use policy; PRIVATISATION;
D O I
10.1080/08111146.2013.785943
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land use planning within and surrounding privatised Australian capital city airports is a fragmented process as a result of: current legislative and policy frameworks; competing stakeholder priorities and interests; and inadequate coordination and disjointed decision-making. Three Australian case studies are examined to detail the context of airport and regional land use planning. Stakeholder Land Use Forums within each case study have served to inform the procedural dynamics and relationships between airport and regional land use decision-making. This article identifies significant themes and stakeholder perspectives regarding on-airport development and broader urban land use policy and planning. First, it outlines the concept of the airport city and examines the model of airport and regional interfaces. Then, it details the policy context that differentiates on-airport land use planning from planning within the surrounding region. The article then analyses the results of the Land Use Forums identifying key themes within the shared and reciprocal interfaces of governance, environment, economic development and infrastructure. The article concludes by detailing the implications of this research to broader urban planning and highlights the core issues contributing to the fragmentation of airport and regional land use planning policy.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 324
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Incoherence of urban planning policy in Bucharest: Its potential for land use conflict
    Ianos, Ioan
    Sorensen, Anthony
    Merciu, Cristina
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 60 : 101 - 112
  • [2] LAND USE CONTROLS FOR AIRPORT PLANNING
    GOTTLIEB, A
    [J]. URBAN LAWYER, 1971, 3 (02): : 266 - 276
  • [3] URBAN LAND POLICY IN AUSTRALIA
    NEUTZE, M
    HARRISON, P
    [J]. HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 1979, 4 (4-6) : 463 - 470
  • [4] Freight operations in city centers: A land use conflict in urban planning
    Cruz-Daravina, Paola Andrea
    Suescun, Juan Pablo Bocarejo
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 108
  • [5] URBAN-RURAL CLASS CONFLICT IN OREGON LAND-USE PLANNING
    MEDLER, J
    MUSHKATEL, A
    [J]. WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 1979, 32 (03): : 338 - 349
  • [6] Urban land use planning
    Godschalk, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2012, 78 (01) : 105 - 106
  • [7] Urban Land Use Planning
    McLaughlin, John
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 (02) : 511 - 511
  • [8] COMPETING FOR GROWTH, AN ANALYSIS OF THE URBAN LAND POLICY IN GALICIA
    Vazquez-Sanchez, Julia
    Tubio-Sanchez, Jose Maria
    [J]. ACE-ARCHITECTURE CITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 14 (39): : 129 - +
  • [10] URBAN LAND USE IN AUSTRALIA, 1966
    MARSDEN, BS
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER, 1970, 11 (03) : 296 - 298