Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Zheng, Longpo [1 ]
Li, Ziqiang [2 ]
Li, Quan [3 ]
Ji, Fang [1 ]
Cai, Zhengdong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Shidong Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Second Mil Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2014年 / 20卷
关键词
partial sacrectomy; reconstruction; biomechanics; finite element analysis; SACRAL CHORDOMA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The biomechanical property of MGT for patients who underwent partial sacrectomy is not well documented, so this study aimed to investigate biomechanical property of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy. Material/Methods: Three 3-dimensional finite element models of lumbosacral region were established: 1) an intact model (INT), 2) a defective model in which partial sacrectomy was performed cephalad to S1 foramina (DEF), and 3) a reconstructed model (REC). Results: Displacements of anchor point on L3 vertebrae in INT, DEF, and REC model were 6.63 mm, 10.62 mm, 4.29 mm (titanium), and 3.86mm (stainless steel), respectively. Stress distribution of the instrument in REC model showed excessive concentration on the caudal spinal rod, which may cause rod failure between spine and ilia. Maximum von Mise stress of the stainless steel instrument was higher than titanium instruments, and values of stress of the anchor point around the sacroiliac joint in the REC model were 26.4MPa with titanium instruments and 23.9 MPa with stainless steel instruments. Conclusions: Lumbosacral reconstruction can significantly increase stiffness of the spinopelvis of patients who underwent partial sacrectomy. However, the rod between L5 and ilia is the weakest region of all instruments. Stainless steel instruments have higher risk of rod failure and are less suitable for lumboiliac arthrodesis than titanium instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 893
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of four reconstruction methods after total sacrectomy: A finite element study
    Zhu, Rui
    Cheng, Li-ming
    Yu, Yan
    Zander, Thomas
    Chen, Bo
    Rohlmann, Antonius
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 27 (08) : 771 - 776
  • [2] The biomechanical effect of lumbopelvic distance reduction on reconstruction after total sacrectomy: a comparative finite element analysis of four techniques
    Turbucz, Mate
    Pokorni, Agoston Jakab
    Hajnal, Benjamin
    Koch, Kristof
    Szoverfi, Zsolt
    Varga, Peter Pal
    Lazary, Aron
    Eltes, Peter Endre
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (10): : 1981 - 1992
  • [3] The Use of Anterior Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion in Spinopelvic Stabilization After High Partial Sacrectomy
    Kashlan, Osama N.
    Monson, David K.
    Refai, Daniel
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 17 (04) : E173 - E176
  • [4] Sacral Prosthesis Substitution as a System of Spinopelvic Reconstruction After Total Sacrectomy: Assessment Using the Finite Element Method
    Ana Maria, Morales-Codina
    Juan Antonio, Martin-Benlloch
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (03): : 512 - 520
  • [5] How safe are partial squats after the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A finite element analysis
    Kotiuk, V.
    Kostrub, O.
    Blonskyi, R.
    Podik, V.
    Sushchenko, L.
    KNEE, 2023, 43 : 192 - 199
  • [6] Reconstruction following partial and total sacrectomy defects: An analysis of outcomes and complications
    Maricevich, Marco
    Maricevich, Renata
    Chim, Harvey
    Moran, Steven L.
    Rose, Peter S.
    Mardini, Samir
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2014, 67 (09): : 1257 - 1266
  • [7] The stability analysis of different reconstruction methods after total sacrectomy
    Yu, Yan
    Cheng, Liming
    Zhu, Rui
    Lv, Haoxuan
    Jia, Yongwei
    Zeng, Zhili
    Yu, Guangrong
    Chen, Bo
    Ding, Zuquan
    2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-11, 2009, : 2745 - +
  • [8] Mechanical effects of partial sacrectomy - When is reconstruction necessary?
    Hugate, Ronald R., Jr.
    Dickey, Ian D.
    Phimolsarnti, Rapin
    Yaszemski, Michael J.
    Sim, Franklin H.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (450) : 82 - 88
  • [9] Biomechanics evaluation of sacroiliac joint pain after lumbosacral fusion: A finite element analysis
    Yao, Zhidong
    Li, Liuxun
    Zhang, Peng
    Yang, Lei
    Bai, Xueling
    Peng, Songlin
    Lai, Yuxiao
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2023, 41 (04) : 875 - 883
  • [10] Finite Element Analysis of the Pelvis after Customized Prosthesis Reconstruction
    Dong, Enchun
    Wang, Ling
    Iqbal, Taimoor
    Li, Dichen
    Liu, Yaxiong
    He, Jiankang
    Zhao, Binghui
    Li, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF BIONIC ENGINEERING, 2018, 15 (03) : 443 - 451