Membrane processes for carbon capture from coal-fired power plant flue gas: A modeling and cost study

被引:136
|
作者
Ramasubramanian, Kartik [1 ]
Verweij, Hendrik [2 ]
Ho, W. S. Winston [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, William G Lowrie Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Flue gas; Post-combustion; Air sweep; Permeance; CO2; DIOXIDE CAPTURE; POLYMER MEMBRANES; CO2; CAPTURE; PERMEATION; SEPARATION; FEASIBILITY; ECONOMICS; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.029
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Favorable economics of electricity generation will be crucial to the successful implementation of post-combustion carbon capture. Hence, the US DOE has set a goal of <35% for the increase on the cost of electricity (CUE) due to CO2 capture. For meeting this goal, there is thus a growing need to perform a cost analysis of emerging separation methods. This paper goes through a detailed modeling and cost-sensitivity study of a promising membrane-based process for carbon capture: the air-sweep process. We have studied the impact of membrane performance, selectivity and permeance, on the CUE increase and the capture cost. The effects of operating parameters as well as the membrane price on the overall cost were determined. Cost calculations show a CUE increase of about 33% along with a capture cost of <$24/t CO2 for the air-sweep process to achieve 90% CO2 recovery and 95% purity of the CO2 product. This process operates at close to atmospheric feed pressure and requires a low membrane module price of $27/m(2), a CO2/N-2 selectivity of about 140 combined with a high CO2 permeance of 3000 GPU. Although the required membrane properties have not yet been achieved, this research emphasizes quantitatively the need to improve the present membranes to realize a purely membrane-based process for the above application. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 310
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling mercury capture in coal-fired power plant flue gas
    Scala, F
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2004, 43 (10) : 2575 - 2589
  • [2] Modeling of Mercury Speciation and Capture in Coal-Fired Flue Gas
    Wang, Heyang
    Ma, Zhanhua
    Lu, Pisi
    Cao, Yan
    Pan, Wei-Ping
    [J]. CLEANER COMBUSTION AND SUSTAINABLE WORLD, 2012, : 353 - 356
  • [3] Carbon Footprint for Mercury Capture from Coal-Fired Boiler Flue Gas
    Gazda-Grzywacz, Magdalena
    Winconek, Lukasz
    Burmistrz, Piotr
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (13)
  • [4] Flue gas desulfurization methods in coal-fired power plant
    Michalski, Jacek A.
    [J]. PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2017, 96 (04): : 731 - 736
  • [5] Corrosion in CO2 capture unit for coal-fired power plant flue gas
    Veawab, A
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1595 - 1598
  • [6] Improved process for mercury capture from flue gas in coal-fired power plants
    Mohanty, Dillip
    Wade, Colin
    Student, James
    Matty, David
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [7] Onsite CO2 Capture from Flue Gas by an Adsorption Process in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Liu, Zhen
    Wang, Lu
    Kong, Xiangming
    Li, Ping
    Yu, Jianguo
    Rodrigues, Alirio E.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2012, 51 (21) : 7355 - 7363
  • [8] Experimental study on corrosion of steels for flue gas reheaters in a coal-fired power plant
    Pan, PeiYuan
    Chen, Heng
    Liang, ZhiYuan
    Zhao, QinXin
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 115 : 267 - 279
  • [9] Analysis and Case study of CO2 Removal Processes for Flue Gas of the Coal-fired Power Plant
    Qiu Zhong-Zhu
    Zheng Chao-Run
    Li Peng
    Pan Wei-Guo
    Dou Bin-Lin
    Xu Hong-Jian
    Li Fang-Qin
    Wang Wen-Huan
    [J]. 2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-11, 2009, : 3848 - +
  • [10] Study on a Coal-Fired Power Plant with CO2 Flue Gas Scrubbing
    Heischkamp, Elizabeth
    Oeljeklaus, Gerd
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 1019 - 1025