A hybrid particle swarm optimization and support vector regression model for modelling permeability prediction of hydrocarbon reservoir

被引:69
|
作者
Akande, Kabiru O. [1 ]
Owolabi, Taoreed O. [2 ,5 ]
Olatunji, Sunday O. [3 ]
AbdulRaheem, AbdulAzeez [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Engn, Inst Digital Commun, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] King Fand Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Phys, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Dammam, Dept Comp Sci, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Fand Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Petr Engn, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[5] Adekunle Ajasin Univ, Phys & Elect Dept, Akungba Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria
关键词
Particle swarm optimization (PSO); Support vector regression (SVR); Hydrocarbon reservoir; Permeability prediction; Optimization techniques; SELECTION; MACHINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.033
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The significance of accurate permeability prediction cannot be over-emphasized in oil and gas reservoir characterization. Support vector machine regression (SVR), a computational intelligence technique, has been very successful in the estimation of permeability and has been widely deployed due to its unique features. However, careful selection of SVR hyper-parameters is highly essential to its optimum performance and this task is traditionally done using trial and error approach (TE-SVR) which takes a lot of time and do not guarantee optimal selection of the hyper-parameters. In this work, the performance of particle swarm optimization (PSO) technique, a heuristic optimization technique, is investigated for the optimal selection of SVR hyper-parameters for the first time in modelling and characterization of hydrocarbon reservoir. The technique is capable of automatic selection of the optimum combination of SVR hyper-parameters resulting in higher predictive accuracy and generalization ability of the developed model. The resulting PSO-SVR model is compared to SVR models whose parameters are obtained through random search (RAND-SVR) and trial and error approach (TE-SVR). The comparison is done using real-life industrial datasets obtained during petroleum exploration from four distinct oil wells located in a Middle Eastern oil and gas field. Simulation results indicate that the PSO-SVR model outperforms all the other models. Error reduction of 15.1%, 26.15%, 12.32% and 7.1% are recorded for PSO-SVR model compared to ordinary SVR (TE-SVR) in well-A, well-B, well-C and well-D, respectively. Also, reduction of 12.8%, 23.97%, 2.51% and 0.11 are recorded when PSO-SVR and RAND-SVR results are compared in the respective wells. Furthermore, the results show the potential of the application of heuristics algorithms, such as PSO, in the optimization of computational intelligence techniques employed in hydrocarbon reservoir characterizations. Therefore, PSO technique is proposed for the optimization of SVR hyper-parameters in permeability prediction and reservoir characterization based on its superior performance over the commonly employed optimization techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 53
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Permeability prediction using hybrid techniques of continuous restricted Boltzmann machine, particle swarm optimization and support vector regression
    Gu, Yufeng
    Bao, Zhidong
    Cui, Guodong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 59 : 97 - 115
  • [2] A Hybrid Model of Least Squares Support Vector Regression Optimized by Particle Swarm Optimization for Electricity Demand Prediction
    Li, Zirong
    Li, Lian
    [J]. ICMLC 2019: 2019 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND COMPUTING, 2019, : 91 - 103
  • [3] PM10 Prediction Model by Support Vector Regression Based on Particle Swarm Optimization
    Arampongsanuwat, Saowalak
    Meesad, Phayung
    [J]. FUTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 13 : 189 - 194
  • [4] PM10 Prediction Model by Support Vector Regression Based on Particle Swarm Optimization
    Arampongsanuwat, Saowalak
    Meesad, Phayung
    [J]. MEMS, NANO AND SMART SYSTEMS, PTS 1-6, 2012, 403-408 : 3693 - +
  • [5] Hybrid particle swarm optimization and support vector machine for bankruptcy prediction
    Peng, Jing
    Peng, Yong
    Ouyang, Ling-Nan
    [J]. Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2008, 42 (04): : 615 - 620
  • [6] Bandwidth prediction based on Nu-support vector regression and parallel hybrid particle swarm optimization
    Hu L.
    Che X.
    Cheng X.
    [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2010, 3 (01) : 70 - 83
  • [7] Immune Particle Swarm Optimization for Support Vector Regression on Forest Fire Prediction
    Wang, Yan
    Wang, Juexin
    Du, Wei
    Wang, Chuncai
    Liang, Yanchun
    Zhou, Chunguang
    Huang, Lan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL NETWORKS - ISNN 2009, PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5552 : 382 - +
  • [8] A HYBRID MODEL FOR BUSINESS FAILURE PREDICTION - UTILIZATION OF PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES
    Chen, Mu-Yen
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, 2011, 21 (02) : 129 - 152
  • [9] Software Reliability Prediction based on Support Vector Regression with Binary Particle Swarm Optimization for Model Mining
    Insanittaqwa, Vika F.
    Rochimah, Siti
    [J]. 2016 1ST INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON APPLICATION FOR TECHNOLOGY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION (ISEMANTIC): SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR A BETTER FUTURE, 2016, : 300 - 305
  • [10] Hybrid support vector regression - Particle swarm optimization for prediction of compressive strength and RCPT of concretes containing metakaolin
    Gilan, Siamak Safarzadegan
    Jovein, Hamed Bahrami
    Ramezanianpour, Ali Akbar
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2012, 34 : 321 - 329