Green space and loneliness: A systematic review with theoretical and methodological guidance for future research

被引:63
|
作者
Astell-Burt, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Hartig, Terry [3 ,4 ]
Putra, I. Gusti Ngurah Edi [1 ,6 ]
Walsan, Ramya [8 ]
Dendup, Tashi [1 ,7 ]
Feng, Xiaoqi [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Populat Wellbeing & Environm Res Lab PowerLab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Hlth & Soc, Fac Arts Social Sci & Human, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Uppsala Univ, Inst Housing & Urban Res, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Psychol, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Univ New South Wales, Sch Populat Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Liverpool, Inst Populat Hlth, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[7] Bhutan Off, Save Children, Thimphu, Bhutan
[8] Macquarie Univ, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Ctr Hlth Syst & Safety Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
SOCIAL-ISOLATION; SELECTIVE MIGRATION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; MENTAL-HEALTH; RISK-FACTORS; URBAN; RESTORATION; ASSOCIATION; COMMUNITY; ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157521
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Persistent loneliness troubles people across the life span, with prevalence as high as 61% in some groups. Urban greening may help to reduce the population health impacts of loneliness and its concomitants, such as hopelessness and despair. However, the literature lacks both a critical appraisal of extant evidence and a conceptual model to explain how green space would work as a structural intervention. Both are needed to guide decision making and further research. We conducted a systematic review of quantitative studies testing associations between green space and loneliness, searching seven databases. Twenty two studies were identified by 25/01/2022. Most of the studies were conducted in high-income countries and fifteen (68 %) had cross-sectional designs. Green space was measured inconsistently using either objective or subjective indicators. Few studies examined specific green space types or qualities. The majority of studies measured general loneliness (e.g. using the UCLA loneliness scale). Different types of loneliness (social, emotional, existential) were not analysed. Of 132 associations, 88 (66.6 %) indicated potential protection from green space against loneliness, with 44 (33.3 %) reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05). We integrated these findings with evidence from qualitative studies to elaborate and extend the existing pathway domain model linking green space and health. These elaborations and extensions acknowledge the following: (a) different types of green space have implications for different types of loneliness; (b) multilevel circumstances influence the likelihood a person will benefit or suffer harm from green space; (c) personal, relational, and collective processes operate within different domains of pathways linking green space with loneliness and its concomitants; (d) loneliness and its concomitants are explicitly positioned as mediators within the broader causal system that links green space with health and wellbeing. This review and model provide guidance for decision making and further epidemiological research on green space and loneliness.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Green logistics practices: A bibliometric and systematic methodological review and future research opportunities
    Tetteh, Francis Kamewor
    Owusu Kwateng, Kwame
    Mensah, John
    [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 476
  • [2] A systematic review of loneliness in bereavement: Current research and future directions
    Vedder, Anneke
    Boerner, Kathrin
    Stokes, Jeffrey E.
    Schut, Henk A. W.
    Boelen, Paul A.
    Stroebe, Margaret S.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 43 : 48 - 64
  • [3] The research on the green leadership: a systematic review and theoretical framework
    Zhong, Jie
    Shao, Xiaojing
    Xiao, Huan
    Yang, Rui
    An, Xin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023,
  • [4] Innovation in Family Firms: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research
    Calabro, Andrea
    Vecchiarini, Mariangela
    Gast, Johanna
    Campopiano, Giovanna
    De Massis, Alfredo
    Kraus, Sascha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2019, 21 (03) : 317 - 355
  • [5] The impact of interventions to promote physical activity in urban green space: A systematic review and recommendations for future research
    Hunter, Ruth F.
    Christian, Hayley
    Veitch, Jenny
    Astell-Burt, Thomas
    Hipp, J. Aaron
    Schipperijn, Jasper
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2015, 124 : 246 - 256
  • [6] Green Bond: A Systematic Literature Review for Future Research Agendas
    Cortellini, Giuseppe
    Panetta, Ida Claudia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (12)
  • [7] The theoretical development and research methodology in green hotels research: A systematic literature review
    Acampora, Alessia
    Lucchetti, Maria Claudia
    Merli, Roberto
    Ali, Faizan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 51 : 512 - 528
  • [8] Theoretical and methodological considerations for future dysconnectivity research
    Vogeley, K
    Falkai, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 15 : 232S - 232S
  • [9] Consumer loneliness: A systematic review and research agenda
    Huang, Shanshan
    Li, Mingfei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [10] Measuring brand image: a systematic review, practical guidance, and future research directions
    Plumeyer, Anja
    Kottemann, Pascal
    Boeger, Daniel
    Decker, Reinhold
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 13 (02) : 227 - 265