Development of guidance documents in the EURAD and PREDIS projects

被引:0
|
作者
Ormai, Peter [1 ]
Nos, Balint [1 ]
Faltejsek, Jiri [2 ]
Miksova, Jitka [3 ]
Zeleznik, Nadja [4 ]
Mele, Irena [4 ]
Fuzik, Kateryna [5 ]
Carbol, Paul [6 ]
Banford, Anthony [7 ]
Holt, Erika [8 ]
机构
[1] PURAM, Puskas T U 11, H-2040 Budaors, Hungary
[2] SURAO, Dlazdena 6, Prague 11000 1, Czech Republic
[3] SURO, Bartoskova 28, Prague 14000 4, Czech Republic
[4] EIMV, Hajdrihova 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[5] SSTC NRS, V Stusa St 35-37, UA-03142 Kiev, Ukraine
[6] JRC, European Commiss, DG Joint Res Ctr, Unit GI6 Res Decommissioning & Waste Management, POB 2340, D-76125 Karlsruhe, Germany
[7] Natl Nucl Lab Ltd, NNL, 5th Floor,Chadwick House,Birchwood Pk, Warrington WA3 6AE, Cheshire, England
[8] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, VTT, Box 1000, Espoo 02044, Finland
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1051/epjn/2022035
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Particular emphasis is dedicated to Knowledge Management activities within the EURAD (European Joint Programme on Radioactive Waste Management) and PREDIS (Pre-disposal management of radioactive waste) projects to ensure the capture of existing knowledge, transfer of knowledge between Members States and management of the knowledge for future generations. The EURAD project has three work packages dedicated to knowledge management. One of them, the EURAD Guidance work package (WP12) is developing a comprehensive suite of specific guidance documents that can be used by Members States with radioactive waste management (RWM) programmes that are at an early stage of development but can be beneficial also to more advanced programmes. The PREDIS project does not have a specifically allocated work package for guidance development. Rather, such activities are integrated within deliverables produced as part of the Strategic Implementation and State of Knowledge actions of the Roadmap contributions on predisposal waste management. The EURAD guidance work is based on the existing PLANDIS guide on RD&D planning, developed by the Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform (IGD-TP). The guidance documents complement other documents prepared in parallel knowledge management activities inside EURAD project: the State of Knowledge documents. The differentiation is that guidance documents explain in more detail how the process can be established and performed, including illustrative examples. The guides are self-standing documents and integrated with the EURAD Roadmap. The target end users of the guidance are primarily programme owners and managers (i.e., governments/administrations, Waste Management Organisations, Research Entities and Technical Support Organisations) responsible for planning and implementing the RWM programme and the supporting RD&D activities at a national level, even though they might also be of use and interest to other interested stakeholders, such as representatives of civil society. To produce a first list of prioritised topics for guidance documents with the aim to select a topic for a pilot guide, the Guidance WP has developed a screening process that includes review by experts and end users. Based on the priority list, the first pilot guide was developed with the title "Cost Assessment and Financing Schemes of Radioactive Waste Management Programmes". Experience gained during the selection of topics for the pilot guide and during its production are being incorporated into the procedure for identification of new topics for which guides will be developed. First, the degree of coverage of the EURAD Roadmap themes by suitable guide documents will be analysed by the WP 12 team. The analysis will be combined with feedback from experts verifying the needs for missing guides. Finally, the potential end user community representatives will be given the opportunity to comment on the prioritisation of selected guidance documents and make additional suggestions. The potential end users stay involved also during the production of the guides. This procedure aims to optimise the scarce expert resources in relation to the identified needs of guidance documents. This article explains the approach for selecting topics for guidance documents and the results obtained both in EURAD and PREDIS.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of guidance documents in the EURAD and PREDIS projects
    Ormai, Peter
    Nos, Bálint
    Faltejsek, Jiři
    Mikšová, Jitka
    Železnik, Nadja
    Mele, Irena
    Fuzik, Kateryna
    Carbol, Paul
    Banford, Anthony
    Holt, Erika
    [J]. EPJ Nuclear Sciences and Technologies, 2022, 8
  • [2] Training and mobility in EU projects EURAD and PREDIS
    Belmans, Niels
    Coeck, Michele
    Havlova, Vaclava
    Valls, Alba
    [J]. EPJ NUCLEAR SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 8
  • [3] LESSONS LEARNED FROM IMPLEMENTING TRAINING AND MOBILITY PROGRAMMES WITHIN EC H2020 PROJECTS EURAD AND PREDIS
    Miksova, J.
    Belmans, Niels
    Carbol, Paul
    Holt, Erika
    Valls, Alba
    Faltejsek, Jiri
    Coeck, Michele
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT, ICEM2023, 2023,
  • [4] Developments and experiences of the CHANCE, MICADO and PREDIS projects in radioactive waste characterization
    Morichi, Massimo
    Fanchini, Erica
    Breuil, Eric
    Bruggeman, Christophe
    Perot, Bertrand
    Ricard, Denise
    Niederleithinger, Ernst
    [J]. EPJ NUCLEAR SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 9
  • [5] Guidance on the review, revision and development of EFSA's cross-cutting guidance documents
    EFSA Scientific Committee
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (04)
  • [6] Incorporating patients' views in guideline development: a systematic review of guidance documents
    Selva, Anna
    Juliana Sanabria, Andrea
    Pequeno, Sandra
    Zhang, Yuan
    Sola, Ivan
    Pardo-Hernandez, Hector
    Selva, Clara
    Schunemann, Holger
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 88 : 102 - 112
  • [7] Considering the Social Determinants of Equity in International Development Evaluation Guidance Documents
    Robertson, Kelly N.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PROGRAM EVALUATION, 2016, 30 (03) : 344 - 373
  • [8] The EU-project ERAPharm -: Incentives for the further development of guidance documents?
    Knacker, T
    Duis, K
    Ternes, T
    Fenner, K
    Escher, B
    Schmitt, H
    Römbke, J
    Garric, J
    Hutchinson, T
    Boxall, ABA
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2005, 12 (02) : 62 - 65
  • [9] New FDA guidance documents
    Bradshaw, Sheldon T.
    [J]. FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, 2007, 62 (02) : 429 - 431
  • [10] A theoretical approach for the development of professional guidance through the formulation and evaluation of projects
    Gaspar Gonzalez, Eusebio
    [J]. DILEMAS CONTEMPORANEOS-EDUCACION POLITICA Y VALORES, 2018, 6 (01):