Independence of data privacy authorities (Part I): International standards

被引:3
|
作者
Greenleaf, Graham [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Fac Law, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Data privacy; Data privacy Asia and Pacific; Data protection authorities; Data protection directive 95/46/EC; Article 29 Working Party; Regional privacy policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.clsr.2011.12.001
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Part I of this article analyses the views of learned commentators on what constitutes the 'independence' of data protection authorities (DPAs). It concludes that a more satisfactory answer needs to be found in the international instruments on data privacy and on human rights bodies, their implementation and judicial interpretation, and in the standards that have been proposed and implemented by DPAs themselves. It finds that only the OECD and APEC privacy agreements did not require a DPA (and therefore have no standards for its independence). Thirteen factors were identified as elements of 'independence' across these instruments and standards, five of which were more commonly found than others. Part II of the article will consider how these criteria have been implemented in laws in the Asia-Pacific. (C) 2012 Graham Greenleaf. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 13
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Independence of data privacy authorities (Part II): Asia-Pacific experience
    Greenleaf, Graham
    [J]. COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2012, 28 (02) : 121 - 129
  • [2] Privacy Interests in Prescription Data, Part I Prescriber Privacy
    Kosseim, Patricia
    El Emam, Khaled
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2009, 7 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [3] Independence of Justice: International standards
    Alejandro Chapunov, Gabriel
    [J]. RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES, 2009, 18 (37): : 1 - 5
  • [4] INTERACTION OF AUTHORITIES AND ACQUAINTANCES IN THE DORIS PRIVACY MODEL OF DATA
    BRUGGEMANN, HH
    [J]. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1989, 364 : 85 - 99
  • [5] Philosophy and Standards, Part I
    Abbott, Anthony
    [J]. ACSMS HEALTH & FITNESS JOURNAL, 2013, 17 (05) : 37 - 39
  • [6] Privacy Preserving Cloud Data Access With Multi-Authorities
    Jung, Taeho
    Li, Xiang-Yang
    Wan, Zhiguo
    Wan, Meng
    [J]. 2013 PROCEEDINGS IEEE INFOCOM, 2013, : 2625 - 2633
  • [7] INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY IN MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEMS: COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
    Pablo Contreras, V
    [J]. ESTUDIOS CONSTITUCIONALES, 2011, 9 (02): : 191 - 248
  • [8] Standards in neurosonology. Part I
    Wojczal, Joanna
    Tomczyk, Tomasz
    Luchowski, Piotr
    Kozera, Grzegorz
    Kazmierski, Radoslaw
    Stelmasiak, Zbigniew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2015, 15 (62) : 307 - 317
  • [9] Independence concepts in possibility theory: Part I
    de Campos, LM
    Huete, JF
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1999, 103 (01) : 127 - 152
  • [10] Privacy Interests in Prescription Data, Part 2 Patient Privacy
    El Emam, Khaled
    Kosseim, Patricia
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2009, 7 (02) : 75 - 78