Effect of Transradial Artery Catheterization on Shock Patients

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Hui [1 ]
Chen, Wenyong [2 ]
Huang, Mingming [3 ]
Wang, Zenggeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Emergency, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Yongxiu Cty Peoples Hosp, Dept Emergency, Jiujiang 330300, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Gongqingcheng Peoples Hosp, Dept Emergency, Jiujiang 332020, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
RADIAL ARTERY; CANNULATION;
D O I
10.1155/2022/8746066
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Objective. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of ultrasound-guided transradial catheterization (TRC) for ICU patients with shock. Methods. 120 shock patients registered in the ICU of our hospital from January 2019 to June 2022 were selected for prospective study. The control group (60 patients) were treated with palpation-guided TRC. The observation group was treated with ultrasound-guided TRC and was divided into the internal puncture group (internal TRC) and external puncture group (external TRC), with 30 cases in each. The first attempt success rate, total success rate, operation duration, complication, measurement of radial artery, and VAS scores were compared in these groups. Results. The success rate was higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05), and higher in the internal puncture group than in the external puncture group (P < 0.05). The first attempt success rate was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05), with no significant difference in between (P > 0.05). The number of attempts and operation duration were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05), with significantly more operation duration in the internal puncture group than in the external puncture group (P < 0.05) and no significant difference in the number of attempts (both P > 0.05). The complication rate was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05) and there was no significant difference in between (P > 0.05). The radial artery diameter, cross-sectional area, and depth from the skin in the observation group were larger than those in the control group (P < 0.05) and there was no significant difference in between (P > 0.05). At 1, 6, 24, and 48 h after the surgery, the observation group showed lower VAS scores than the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion. The ultrasound-guided TRC reduced the number of attempts, the complication rates, and the operation duration. For patients with shock, if Doppler ultrasound cannot detect blood flow, the success rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and its advantage is worthy of promotion in severe patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with prior brachial artery cutdown
    Caputo, RP
    Simons, A
    Giambartolomei, A
    Grant, W
    Fedele, K
    Esente, P
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 1999, 48 (03) : 271 - 274
  • [2] Radial Artery Patency After Transradial Catheterization
    Kotowycz, Mark A.
    Dzavik, Vladimir
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [3] EFFECT OF PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETERIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONISCHEMIC CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: A NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS
    Diaz-Arocutipa, Carlos
    Moreno, Guillermo
    Gil, David Galan
    Nieto, Sara
    Romo, Martin
    Vicent, Lourdes
    SHOCK, 2024, 62 (02): : 186 - 192
  • [4] Transradial percutaneous approach for cardiac catheterization in patients with previous brachial artery cutdown
    Magarinos, Eduardo
    Solioz, German
    Cermesoni, Gabriel
    Koretzky, Martin
    Carnevalini, Mariana
    Gonzalez, Daniel
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2013, 73 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [5] FREQUENCY OF RADIAL ARTERY ANATOMIC VARIATIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSRADIAL HEART CATHETERIZATION
    Ostojic, Zvonimir
    Bulum, Josko
    Ernst, Aleksander
    Strozzi, Maja
    Maric-Besic, Kristina
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2015, 54 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [6] Transradial catheterization in elderly patients.
    Alameda, M
    Disdier, VP
    Gomez-Juame, A
    Santoyo, O
    Contreras, G
    Colino, RG
    Bethencourt, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (6A): : 126E - 126E
  • [7] Radial Artery Occlusion-A Limitation of Transradial Catheterization
    Goyal, B. K.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 76 (05) : 659 - 659
  • [8] Transradial cardiac catheterization in elderly patients
    Caputo, RP
    Simons, A
    Giambartolomei, A
    Grant, W
    Fedele, K
    Abraham, S
    Reger, MJ
    Walford, GD
    Esente, P
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2000, 51 (03) : 287 - 290
  • [9] Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization
    Koutouzis, Michael
    Maniotis, Christos
    Avdikos, Grigorios
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (01) : 103 - 103
  • [10] Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization
    Avdikos, Grigorios
    Karatasakis, Aris
    Tsoumeleas, Andreas
    Lazaris, Efstathios
    Ziakas, Antonios
    Koutouzis, Michael
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2017, 7 (03) : 305 - 316