Natural hybridization within seed sources of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)

被引:15
|
作者
Xu, Shiqin [1 ]
Tauer, C. G. [1 ]
Nelson, C. Dana [2 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, So Inst Forest Genet, So Res Stn, USDA, Saucier, MS 39574 USA
关键词
genetic diversity;
D O I
10.1007/s11295-008-0157-x
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Shortleaf and loblolly pine trees (n = 93 and 102, respectively) from 22 seed sources of the Southwide Southern Pine Seed Source Study plantings or equivalent origin were evaluated for amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) variation. These sampled trees represent shortleaf pine and loblolly pine, as they existed across their native geographic ranges before intensive forest management. Using 17 primer pairs, a total of 96 AFLPs between shortleaf pine and loblolly pine were produced and scored on the sample trees and two control-pollinated F1 interspecies hybrids and their parents. In addition, the well known isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) isozyme marker was scored for all trees. IDH detected two putative hybrids among the loblolly pine samples and two among the shortleaf pine samples, while either 13 or 12 putative hybrids were detected using all AFLP markers and IDH and either NewHybrids or Structure software, respectively. Results of this study show that later generation hybrids can be reliably identified using AFLP markers and confirmed that IDH is not a definitive marker for detecting hybrids; that is, at least in some seed sources, the alternative species' IDH allele resides in the source species. Based on all the markers, hybridization frequency varied geographically, ranging from 30% in an Arkansas seed source to 0% in several other seed sources. The hybridization level was higher in populations west of the Mississippi River than in populations east of the river; the shortleaf pine hybridization rates were 16.3% and 2.4% and the loblolly pine rates were 4.5% and 3.3%, west and east of the river, respectively. The results suggest that hybridization between these two species is significant but varies by seed source and species, and the potential for the unintended creation of hybrids should be considered in forest management decisions regarding both natural and artificial regeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 858
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Natural hybridization within seed sources of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)
    Shiqin Xu
    C. G. Tauer
    C. Dana Nelson
    [J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2008, 4 : 849 - 858
  • [2] Genetic diversity within and among populations of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)
    Shiqin Xu
    C. G. Tauer
    C. Dana Nelson
    [J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2008, 4 : 859 - 868
  • [3] Genetic diversity within and among populations of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)
    Xu, Shiqin
    Tauer, C. G.
    Nelson, C. Dana
    [J]. TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2008, 4 (04) : 859 - 868
  • [4] Restoring longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stands: Effects of restoration treatments on natural loblolly pine regeneration
    Knapp, Benjamin O.
    Wang, G. Geoff
    Hu, Huifeng
    Walker, Joan L.
    Tennant, Carsyn
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 262 (07) : 1157 - 1167
  • [5] Bidirectional introgression between loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.) has increased since the 1950s
    John F. Stewart
    Charles G. Tauer
    C. D. Nelson
    [J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2012, 8 : 725 - 735
  • [6] Microsatellite versus AFLP analyses of pre-management introgression levels in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.)
    Stewart, John F.
    Liu, Yanyan
    Tauer, Charles G.
    Nelson, C. D.
    [J]. TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2010, 6 (06) : 853 - 862
  • [7] Microsatellite versus AFLP analyses of pre-management introgression levels in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.)
    John F. Stewart
    Yanyan Liu
    Charles G. Tauer
    C. D. Nelson
    [J]. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2010, 6 : 853 - 862
  • [8] Bidirectional introgression between loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P-echinata Mill.) has increased since the 1950s
    Stewart, John F.
    Tauer, Charles G.
    Nelson, C. D.
    [J]. TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2012, 8 (04) : 725 - 735
  • [9] Pollen pool heterogeneity in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill.
    Dyer, RJ
    Sork, VL
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2001, 10 (04) : 859 - 866
  • [10] Water use of co-occurring loblolly (Pinus taeda) and shortleaf (Pinus echinata) in a loblolly pine plantation in the Piedmont
    Boggs, Johnny
    Sun, Ge
    Domec, Jean-Christophe
    McNulty, Steve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2024, 60 (04): : 897 - 911