Methodology for Assessment of Surface Defects in Undermatched Pipeline Girth Welds

被引:13
|
作者
Pepin, Aurelien [1 ]
Tkaczyk, Tomasz [1 ]
O'Dowd, Noel [2 ]
Nikbin, Kamran [3 ]
机构
[1] Technip, Offshore Engn Div, Aberdeen AB32 6TQ, Scotland
[2] Univ Limerick, Mat & Surface Sci Inst, Dept Mech Aeronaut & Biomed Engn, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Mech Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Analytical formulas - Crack driving force - Crack tip opening displacement - Engineering critical assessment - Installation methods - Parametric finite elements - Pipeline girth welds - Reference stress method;
D O I
10.1115/1.4029190
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The demand for subsea transport of highly corrosive constituents has noticeably increased in recent years. This has driven the requirement for high strength pipelines with enhanced corrosion resistance such as chromium stainless steel or bimetal pipes. The latter are carbon steel pipes with a corrosion resistant alloy lining. Reeling is a cost effective installation method for small to medium size subsea pipelines, up to 457.2mm (18 in.) in diameter. However, plastic straining associated with reeling has an effect on weld defect acceptance criteria. The maximum acceptable defect sizes are typically developed using engineering critical assessment (ECA), based on the reference stress method, which requires that the weld metal is equal to or stronger than the parent metal in terms of the stress(strain curve. However, evenmatch/overmatch cannot always be achieved in the case of subsea stainless or bimetal pipelines. In this work, a parametric finite( element (FE) study was performed to assess the effect of weld metal undermatch on the crack driving force, expressed in terms of the crack tip opening displacement (CTOD). Subsequently, the fracture assessment methodology for reeled pipes was proposed, where the ECA as per BS7910 is first carried out. These acceptable defect sizes are then reduced, using an analytical formula developed in this work, to account for weld undermatch.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] EPRG TIER 2 GUIDELINES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF DEFECTS IN TRANSMISSION PIPELINE GIRTH WELDS
    Denys, Rudi
    Andrews, Robert
    Zarea, Mures
    Knauf, Gerhard
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE 2010, VOL 2, 2010, : 873 - 879
  • [3] Assessment of pipeline girth weld defects
    Jakobsen, RA
    Bai, Y
    Langen, I
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND (1999) ISOPE EUROPEAN OFFSHORE MECHANICS SYMPOSIUM: PIPELINES: CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS, ENVIRONMENTS AND DATABASE, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, MATERIALS, 1999, : 68 - 70
  • [4] Assessment of pipeline girth weld defects
    Chen, MMJ
    Dong, G
    Jakobsen, RA
    Bai, Y
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH (2000) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL II, 2000, : 263 - 274
  • [5] Assessment of flaws in pipeline girth welds—a critical review
    Henryk Pisarski
    Welding in the World, 2013, 57 : 933 - 945
  • [6] State of the art for flaw assessment of pipeline girth welds
    Pisarski, H.
    Rivista Italiana della Saldatura, 2012, 64 (05): : 627 - 638
  • [7] Development of a strain based fracture assessment procedure for undermatched pipe girth welds subjected to bending
    de Souza, Rodolfo F.
    Ruggieri, Claudio
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2017, 92 : 381 - 393
  • [8] FAILURE ASSESSMENT FOR GIRTH WELD DEFECTS OF PIPELINE
    Feng, Qingshan
    Lin, Yi-han
    Li, Bin
    Song, Hanchen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE 2010, VOL 1, 2010, : 339 - 345
  • [9] Assessment of flaws in pipeline girth welds-a critical review
    Pisarski, Henryk
    WELDING IN THE WORLD, 2013, 57 (06) : 933 - 945
  • [10] FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH ASSESSMENT OF PIPELINE STEELS AND GIRTH WELDS
    Park, Dong-Yeob
    Liang, Jie
    Gravel, Jean-Philippe
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP2022, VOL 4B, 2022,