Comparison of different multicriteria methods in selecting optimal biomechanical model parameters

被引:1
|
作者
Srdjevic, Zorica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Agr, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
关键词
Biomechanical model; parameter identification; multicriteria; CP; TOPSIS; IDENTIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1002/zamm.201100017
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Identification of model parameters is essential to biomechanical modeling. Different approaches for selecting optimal model parameters are in use, including compromise programming (CP), a multicriteria method. CP was successfully applied on the linear 4-degree-of-freedom biomechanical model of the seated human driver identification problem. For verification purposes, the other multicriteria method called TOPSIS is used for solving the same problem. Whether CP or TOPSIS is applied, the identified model parameters give satisfactory and similar human model response on vibration excitation. This justifies and recommends the multicriteria approach for application in selecting the optimal, in a multicriteria sense, biomechanical model parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a multicriteria decision-making model for selecting optimal aviation fatigue measurement methods
    Rashid, Hamad
    Bendak, Salaheddine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2022, 28 (03) : 1362 - 1371
  • [2] Comparison of different methods for biomechanical signal smoothing
    Fazel-Rezai, R
    Shwedyk, E
    Onyshko, S
    CANADIAN MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING SOCIETY, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 32 - 33
  • [3] Multicriteria analysis in selecting the optimal variant of solar system
    Radziejowska, Aleksandra
    Zima, Krzysztof
    1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT (SEED 2016), 2016, 10
  • [4] A biomechanical comparison of different baseball batting training methods
    Chen, Wei-Han
    Chiu, Yu-Cheng
    Liu, Chiang
    Chan, Ming-Sheng
    Fiolo, Nicholas J.
    Shiang, Tzyy-Yuang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE & COACHING, 2022, 17 (03) : 599 - 608
  • [5] Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam
    Mahmoud, MR
    Garcia, LA
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2000, 15 (05) : 471 - 478
  • [6] Comparison of Fixation Methods for Scaphoid Nonunions A Biomechanical Model
    Panchal, Anand
    Kubiak, Erik N.
    Keshner, Mitchell
    Fulkerson, Eric
    Paksima, Nader
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2007, 65 (04): : 271 - 275
  • [7] Comparison of fixation methods for scaphoid nonunions: a biomechanical model
    Panchal, Anand
    Kubiak, Erik
    Keshner, Mitchell
    Fulkerson, Eric
    Paskima, Nader
    EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 18 (02): : 66 - 71
  • [8] Biomechanical comparison of xenogeneic bone material treated with different methods
    Feng, Wei
    Li, Dongsong
    Zang, Junting
    Fu, Li
    XENOTRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 24 (06)
  • [9] Selecting Prototypes for Two Multicriteria Classification Methods: A Comparative Study
    Costa, Nathanael C.
    Brasil Filho, Amaury T.
    Coelho, Andre L. V.
    Pinheiro, Placido R.
    2009 WORLD CONGRESS ON NATURE & BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED COMPUTING (NABIC 2009), 2009, : 1701 - 1706
  • [10] Comparison of Different Methods for Optimal Placement of PMUs
    Almutairi, A. M.
    Milanovic, J. V.
    2009 IEEE BUCHAREST POWERTECH, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 1624 - 1629