Non-profit housing Influencing, Leading and Dominating the unitary rental market:: Three case studies

被引:56
|
作者
Kemeny, J
Kersloot, J
Thalmann, P
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Inst Housing & Urban Res, S-80129 Gavle, Sweden
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Delft, OTB Res Inst Housing Urban & Mobil Studies, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
non-profit housing; social market philosophy; unitary rental market; integrated rental market; Sweden; the Netherlands; Switzerland;
D O I
10.1080/02673030500290985
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The distinction between dual rental systems and unitary rental markets is refined and developed. In particular, unitary rental markets are defined as markets in which barriers to nonprofit providers competing on the rental market are removed, reserving the term 'integrated rental markets' for markets in which non-profit providers are sufficiently developed to be able to compete without the need for invasive regulation. The study also develops the distinction made in previous work between markets in which non-profit providers influence, lead and dominate the market. Case studies are then presented: Switzerland, where non-profit renting is weakly influencing, Sweden where it is leading, and the Netherlands where it is dominating. It is concluded that while in both the Netherlands and Sweden there is evidence of continual deregulation consistent with a tendency from unitary to integrated markets, there is no evidence of consistent change in that direction and even signs of some retrograde changes.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 872
页数:18
相关论文
共 20 条