In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a 4.5mm Narrow Locking Compression Plate Construct Versus a 4.5mm Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate Construct for Arthrodesis of the Equine Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

被引:19
|
作者
Ahern, Benjamin J. [1 ]
Showalter, Brent L. [2 ]
Elliott, Dawn M. [2 ]
Richardson, Dean W. [1 ]
Getman, Liberty M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, New Bolton Ctr, Sch Vet Med, Dept Clin Studies, Kennett Sq, PA 19348 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
TRANSARTICULAR CORTICAL SCREWS; LAG FASHION; HORSES; FIXATION; HEADLESS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.01111.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the in vitro biomechanical properties of a 4.5mm narrow locking compression plate (PIP-LCP) with 2 abaxially located transarticular screws and a 4.5mm limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) with 2 abaxially located transarticular screws using equine pasterns. Study Design Experimental. Paired in vitro biomechanical testing of 2 methods for stabilizing adult equine forelimb PIP joints. Animal Adult equine forelimbs (n=8 pairs). Methods Each pair of PIP joints were randomly instrumented with either a PIP-LCP or LC-DCP plate axially and 2 parasagitally positioned 5.5mm transarticular screws. The proximal aspect of the proximal phalanx (P1) and the distal aspect of the middle phalanx (P2) were embedded to allow for mounting on a mechanical testing machine. Each construct was tested in both cyclic and subsequently single cycle to failure in 4-point bending. The displacement required to maintain a target load of 1kN over 3600 cycles at 1Hz was recorded. Maximum bending moment at failure and construct stiffness was calculated from the single cycle to failure testing. Results In cyclic testing, significantly more displacement occurred in the LC-DCP (0.46 +/- 0.10mm) than for the PIP-LCP (0.17 +/- 0.11mm) constructs (P=.016). During single cycle testing there was no significant difference in the bending moment between the LC-DCP (148.7 +/- 19.4Nm) and the PIP-LCP (164.6 +/- 17.6Nm) constructs (P=.553) and the stiffness of the LC-DCP (183.9 +/- 26.9Nmm) was significantly lower than for the PIP-LCP (279.8 +/- 15.9N/mm) constructs (P=.011). All constructs failed by fracture of the bone associated with the transarticular screws and subsequently bending of the plates at the middle hole. Conclusions Use of the PIP-LCP resulted in a stiffer construct of the same strength as the LC-DCP in vitro using this 4-point bending model.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 339
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a 5-Hole 4.5 mm Locking Compression Plate and 5-Hole 4.5 mm Dynamic Compression Plate for Equine Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis
    Seo, Jong-pil
    Yamaga, Takashi
    Tsuzuki, Nao
    Yamada, Kazutaka
    Haneda, Shingo
    Furuoka, Hidehumi
    Sasaki, Naoki
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2014, 43 (05) : 606 - 611
  • [2] Arthrodesis of the Equine Proximal Interphalangeal Joint: A Biomechanical Comparison of 3-Hole 4.5 mm Locking Compression Plate and 3-Hole 4.5 mm Narrow Dynamic Compression Plate, with Two Transarticular 5.5 mm Cortex Screws
    Zoppa, Andre L. V.
    Santoni, Brandon
    Puttlitz, Christian M.
    Cochran, Kayla
    Hendrickson, Dean A.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2011, 40 (02) : 253 - 259
  • [3] An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a 5.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation with a 4.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation of Osteotomized Equine Third Metacarpal Bones
    Sod, Gary A.
    Riggs, Laura M.
    Mitchell, Colin F.
    Martin, George S.
    Gill, Marjorie S.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2010, 39 (05) : 581 - 587
  • [4] An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a 5.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation with a 4.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones
    Sod, Gary A.
    Mitchell, Colin F.
    Hubert, Jeremy D.
    Martin, George S.
    Gill, Marjorie S.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2008, 37 (03) : 289 - 293
  • [5] Comparison of limited-contact dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate constructs for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis in the horse
    Rocconi, Richard A.
    Carmalt, James L.
    Sampson, Sarah N.
    Elder, Steve H.
    Gilbert, Eric E.
    CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 2015, 56 (06): : 615 - 619
  • [6] Comparison of a 3-hole 4.5-mm Dynamic Compression Plate and a 7-hole 5.5-mm Y Locking Compression Plate for Arthrodesis of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint in Horses-an Ex Vivo Biomechanical Study
    Salazar Latorre, Carlos Adolfo
    de Souza, Anderson Fernando
    Ramirez Ramos, Paula Andrea
    Nobrega, Fernanda Silveira
    Mulder van de Graaf, Guilherme Maia
    Martins Pereira, Cesar Augusto
    Auada Ferrigno, Cassio Ricardo
    Hendrickson, Dean A.
    do Valle De Zoppa, Andre Luis
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 94
  • [7] In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contact dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate
    Aguila, AZ
    Manos, JM
    Orlansky, AS
    Todhunter, RJ
    Trotter, EJ
    van der Meulen, MCH
    VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2005, 18 (04) : 220 - 226
  • [8] Arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint: A biomechanical comparison of two 7-hole 3.5-mm broad and two 5-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plates
    Watt, BC
    Edwards, RB
    Markel, MD
    McCabe, R
    Wilson, DG
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2002, 31 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [9] Arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint: A biomechanical comparison of three 4.5-mm and two 5.5-mm cortical screws
    Watt, BC
    Edwards, RB
    Markel, MD
    McCabe, R
    Wilson, DG
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2001, 30 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [10] In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a Modified 5.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation with a 5.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation of Osteotomized Equine Third Metacarpal Bones
    Sod, Gary A.
    Riggs, Laura M.
    Mitchell, Colin F.
    Martin, George S.
    Gill, Marjorie S.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2010, 39 (07) : 833 - 838