Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries

被引:736
|
作者
Kleijn, D
Baquero, RA
Clough, Y
Díaz, M
De Esteban, J
Fernández, F
Gabriel, D
Herzog, F
Holzschuh, A
Jöhl, R
Knop, E
Kruess, A
Marshall, EJP
Steffan-Dewenter, I
Tscharntke, T
Verhulst, J
West, TM
Yela, JL
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Nature Conservat & Plant Ecol Grp, NL-6708 PD Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Ciencias Medio Ambiente, Dept Ciencies Ambientales, E-45071 Toledo, Spain
[3] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agroecol, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[4] Swiss Fed Res Stn Agroecol & Agr, Agroscope FAL Reckenholz, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Marshall Agroecol Ltd, Winscombe BS25 1DU, Somerset, England
关键词
biodiversity conservation; European Union; farmland wildlife; land-use intensity; policy evaluation; Red Data Book species;
D O I
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Agri-environment schemes are an increasingly important tool for the maintenance and restoration of farmland biodiversity in Europe but their ecological effects are poorly known. Scheme design is partly based on non-ecological considerations and poses important restrictions on evaluation studies. We describe a robust approach to evaluate agri-environment schemes and use it to evaluate the biodiversity effects of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. We compared species density of vascular plants, birds, bees, grasshoppers and crickets, and spiders on 202 paired fields, one with an agri-environment scheme, the other conventionally managed. In all countries, agri-environment schemes had marginal to moderately positive effects on biodiversity. However, uncommon species benefited in only two of five countries and species listed in Red Data Books rarely benefited from agri-environment schemes. Scheme objectives may need to differentiate between biodiversity of common species that can be enhanced with relatively simple modifications in farming practices and diversity or abundance of endangered species which require more elaborate conservation measures.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 254
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scaling the benefits of agri-environment schemes for biodiversity
    Kay, Geoffrey
    [J]. LEARNING FROM AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES IN AUSTRALIA: INVESTING IN BIODIVERSITY AND OTHER ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ON FARMS, 2016, : 139 - 149
  • [2] How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?
    Kleijn, D
    Sutherland, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2003, 40 (06) : 947 - 969
  • [3] Ecological effects of agri-environment schemes on birds in different European countries
    Kleijn, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2006, 147 (05): : 20 - 21
  • [4] Agri-environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England
    Ovenden, GN
    Swash, ARH
    Smallshire, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1998, 35 (06) : 955 - 960
  • [5] Optimizing the biodiversity gain from agri-environment schemes
    Merckx, Thomas
    Feber, Ruth E.
    Riordan, Philip
    Townsend, Martin C.
    Bourn, Nigel A. D.
    Parsons, Mark S.
    Macdonald, David W.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 130 (3-4) : 177 - 182
  • [6] Exploring the social benefits of agri-environment schemes in England
    Mills, Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2012, 28 (04) : 612 - 621
  • [7] Achieving greater gains in biodiversity from agri-environment schemes
    Gibbons, Philip
    [J]. LEARNING FROM AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES IN AUSTRALIA: INVESTING IN BIODIVERSITY AND OTHER ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ON FARMS, 2016, : 255 - 264
  • [8] Declining biodiversity in agricultural landscapes and the effectiveness of agri-environment schemes
    Berendse, F
    Chamberlain, D
    Kleijn, D
    Schekkerman, H
    [J]. AMBIO, 2004, 33 (08) : 499 - 502
  • [9] Will agri-environment schemes deliver substantial biodiversity gain, and if not why not?
    Whittingham, Mark J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2007, 44 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [10] Optimizing agri-environment schemes for biodiversity, ecosystem services or both?
    Ekroos, Johan
    Olsson, Ola
    Rundlof, Maj
    Watzold, Frank
    Smith, Henrik G.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 172 : 65 - 71