Automated Bilateral Multiple-issue Negotiation with No Information About Opponent

被引:12
|
作者
Zheng, Ronghuo [1 ]
Chakraborty, Nilanjan [1 ]
Dai, Tinglong [1 ]
Sycara, Katia [1 ]
Lewis, Michael
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Inst Robot, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/HICSS.2013.626
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate offer generation methods for automated negotiation on multiple issues with no information about the opponent's utility function. In existing negotiation literature, it is usually assumed that an agent has full information or probabilistic beliefs about the other agent's utility function. However, it is usually not possible for agents to have complete information about the other agent's preference or accurate probability distributions. We prove that using an alternating projection strategy, it is possible to reach an agreement. in general automated multi-attribute negotiation, where the agents have nonlinear utility functions and no information about the utility function of the other agent. We also prove that rational agents do not have any incentive to deviate from the proposed strategy. We further present simulation results to demonstrate that the solution obtained from our protocol is quite close to the Nash bargaining solution.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 527
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques
    Baarslag, Tim
    Hendrikx, Mark J. C.
    Hindriks, Koen V.
    Jonker, Catholijn M.
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, 30 (05) : 849 - 898
  • [2] Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques
    Tim Baarslag
    Mark J. C. Hendrikx
    Koen V. Hindriks
    Catholijn M. Jonker
    Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2016, 30 : 849 - 898
  • [3] Concurrent multiple-issue negotiation for Internet-based services
    Dang, Jiangbo
    Huhns, Michael N.
    IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING, 2006, 10 (06) : 42 - 49
  • [4] Wholesale power trading through concurrent multiple-issue negotiation
    Dang, Jiangbo
    Lu, Yan
    Zhao, Peng
    Jafari, Mohsen
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2011, 33 (3-4) : 386 - 405
  • [5] Detecting opponent concessions in multi-issue automated negotiation
    Buffett, Scott
    Comeau, Luc
    Spencer, Bruce
    Fleming, Michael W.
    2006 ICEC: EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, PROCEEDINGS: THE NEW E-COMMERCE: INNOVATIONS FOR CONQUERING CURRENT BARRIERS, OBSTACLES AND LIMITATIONS TO CONDUCTING SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS ON THE INTERNET, 2006, : 11 - 18
  • [6] Rethinking Frequency Opponent Modeling in Automated Negotiation
    Tunali, Okan
    Aydogan, Reyhan
    Sanchez-Anguix, Victor
    PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS (PRIMA 2017), 2017, 10621 : 263 - 279
  • [7] Cooperative procedures for multiple-issue negotiations
    Raith, MG
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH PROCEEDINGS 1999, 2000, : 220 - 225
  • [8] A Survey of Opponent Modeling Techniques in Automated Negotiation
    Baarslag, Tim
    Hendrikx, Mark J. C.
    Hindriks, Koen V.
    Jonker, Catholijn M.
    AAMAS'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS & MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, : 575 - 576
  • [9] Multiple-issue bargaining and axiomatic solutions
    Ponsati, C
    Watson, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 1997, 26 (04) : 501 - 524
  • [10] Predicting the Performance of Opponent Models in Automated Negotiation
    Baarslag, Tim
    Hendrikx, Mark
    Hindriks, Koen
    Jonker, Catholijn
    2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGY (IAT 2013), 2013, : 59 - 66