Reliability and discriminant validity of dynamic reoffending risk indicators in forensic clinical practice

被引:7
|
作者
Philipse, MWG
Koeter, MWJ
Van Der Staak, CR
Van Den Brink, W
机构
[1] Pompestichting, Dept Res, NL-6503 CK Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Res Inst Addict, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
risk assessment; forensic inpatients; psychometrics;
D O I
10.1177/0093854805279946
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study examines the psychometric properties of the 47-item Clinical Inventory of Dynamic Reoffending Risk Indicators, developed for use in forensic inpatient mental health settings. By incorporating risk factors suggested by clinicians, the instrument provides a viable alternative to the preponderance of static predictors in most risk assessment tools. Interrater and test-retest reliability and discriminant validity were evaluated in a prospective design under naturalistic clinical conditions. It was concluded that reliability levels were similar to those of a widely used comparable tool, the Historical/Clinical/Risk Management scheme. For clinical use, a multiple-rater consensus procedure is nevertheless recommended. The instrument was shown to discriminate accurately between a group of recently admitted, high-risk patients and a lower risk group about to be discharged.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 664
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forensic occupational therapy to reduce risk of reoffending: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom
    Connell, Catriona
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 27 (06): : 907 - 928
  • [2] Relative validity and reliability of a diet risk score (DRS) for clinical practice
    Johnston, Emily A.
    Petersen, Kristina S.
    Beasley, Jeannette M.
    Krussig, Tobias
    Mitchell, Diane C.
    Van Horn, Linda V.
    Weiss, Rick
    Kris-Etherton, Penny M.
    BMJ NUTRITION, PREVENTION & HEALTH, 2020, 3 (02) : 263 - 269
  • [3] Relative Validity and Reliability of a Diet Risk Screener (DRS) for Clinical Practice
    Johnston, Emily A.
    Petersen, Kristina S.
    Van Horn, Linda
    Mitchell, Diane C.
    Beasley, Jeannette M.
    Kris-etherton, Penny M.
    CIRCULATION, 2020, 141
  • [4] Preliminary findings on reliability and validity of the Historical-Clinical-Risk assessment in a forensic psychiatric setting
    Dernevik, M
    PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 1998, 4 (02) : 127 - 137
  • [5] FORENSIC-CLINICAL INTERVIEW: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY FOR THE EVALUATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY
    Vilarino, Manuel
    Arce, Ramon
    Farina, Francisca
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED TO LEGAL CONTEXT, 2013, 5 (01): : 1 - 21
  • [6] Validation of the victoria symptom validity test with performance and symptom validity indicators in a mixed clinical and forensic sample
    Zane, K. L.
    Oliveri, M., V
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 30 (03) : 435 - 435
  • [7] Reliability and validity of a quality tool for assessing clinical forensic medicine legal reports
    Stevenson, Carol
    Kramer, Kathleen
    Edmond, Gary
    Martire, Kristy
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE, 2022, 89
  • [8] Discriminant function of perinatal risk that predicts early neonatal morbidity:: Its validity and reliability
    Zapata-Vázquez, RE
    Rodríguez-Carvajal, LA
    Sierra-Basto, G
    Alonzo-Vázquez, FM
    Echeverría-Eguíluz, M
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 34 (03) : 214 - 221
  • [9] Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations
    Cheung, Gordon W.
    Cooper-Thomas, Helena D.
    Lau, Rebecca S.
    Wang, Linda C.
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2024, 41 (02) : 745 - 783
  • [10] Beliefs in the inheritance of risk factors for suicide scale: Development, reliability, stability, and convergent and discriminant validity
    Voracek, Martin
    Loibl, Lisa Mariella
    Sonneck, Gernot
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2007, 101 (01) : 107 - 116