Perceptual and acoustic parameters of vocal nodules in children

被引:19
|
作者
Joia Gramuglia, Andrea Cristina [1 ]
Tavares, Elaine L. M. [1 ]
Rodrigues, Sergio Augusto [2 ]
Martins, Regina H. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol Otolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
[2] UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Biosci Inst, Dept Biostat, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
关键词
Child; Dysphonia; Nodules; Hoarseness; Auditory-perceptual vocal analysis; Acoustic vocal analysis; SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; FOLD NODULES; VOICE; DYSPHONIA; CHILDHOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.11.032
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Vocal nodules constitute the major cause of dysphonia during childhood. Auditory-perceptual and acoustic vocal analyses have been used to differentiate vocal nodules from normal voice in children. Purpose: To study the value of auditory-perceptual and acoustic vocal analyses in assessments of children with nodules. Design: Diagnostic test study. Patients and interventions: A comparative study was carried out including 100 children with videolaryngoscopic diagnosis of vocal nodules (nodule group-NG); and 100 children without vocal symptoms and with normal videolaryngoscopic exams (control group-CG). The age range of both groups was between 4 and 11 years. All children underwent auditory-perceptual vocal analyses (GRBASI scale); maximum phonation time and s/z ratio were calculated, and acoustic vocal analysis (MDVP software) were carried out. Results: There was no difference in the values of maximum phonation time and s/z ratio between groups. Auditory-perceptual analysis indicated greater compromising of voice parameters for NG, compared to CG: G (79 versus 24), R (53 versus 3), B (67 versus 23) and S (35 versus 1). The values of acoustic parameters jitter, PPQ shimmer, APQ, NHR and SPI were higher for NG for CG. The parameter f0 did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Compromising of auditory-perceptual (G, R, B and S) and acoustic vocal parameters (jitter, PPQ shimmer, APQ, NHR and SPI) was greater for children with nodules than for those of the control group, which makes them important methods for assessing child dysphonia. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 316
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Relation of RBH Auditory-Perceptual Scale to Acoustic and Electroglottographic Voice Analysis in Children With Vocal Nodules
    Szklanny, Krzysztof
    Wrzeciono, Piotr
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 41647 - 41658
  • [2] Electroglottographic and acoustic analysis of voice in children with vocal nodules
    Szklannya, K.
    Gubrynowicz, R.
    Ratynska, J.
    Chojnacka-Wadolowska, Danuta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 122 : 82 - 88
  • [3] Effects of vocal nodules on acoustic characteristics of voice in children : an acoustic analysis of voice
    Aoki, Toshihito
    Takeyama, Takaaki
    Sakamoto, Yuki
    Shimada, Aki
    Kondo, Eiji
    Nakano, Seiichi
    Fukuda, Junya
    Azuma, Takahiro
    Sato, Go
    Kitamura, Yoshiaki
    Hosokawa, Kiyohito
    Udaka, Jiro
    Takeda, Noriaki
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION, 2021, 68 (3-4): : 276 - 279
  • [4] Vocal nodules in children
    Coolidge, A
    BOSTON MEDICAL AND SURGICAL JOURNAL, 1907, 156 : 704 - 704
  • [5] VOCAL NODULES IN CHILDREN
    VONLEDEN, H
    EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 1985, 64 (10): : 29 - &
  • [6] VOCAL NODULES IN CHILDREN
    BENJAMIN, B
    CROXSON, G
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1987, 96 (05): : 530 - 533
  • [7] CHILDREN WITH VOCAL NODULES
    WILSON, DK
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1961, 26 (01): : 19 - 26
  • [9] Intensive Versus Traditional Voice Therapy for Vocal Nodules: Perceptual, Physiological, Acoustic and Aerodynamic Changes
    Fu, Sherry
    Theodoros, Deborah G.
    Ward, Elizabeth C.
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2015, 29 (02) : 260.e31 - 260.e44
  • [10] Acoustic and perceptual analysis of vocal tremor
    Mertens, Christophe
    Schoentgen, Jean
    Grenez, Francis
    Skodda, Sabine
    14TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2013), VOLS 1-5, 2013, : 2256 - 2260