Validation of the Neonatal Satisfaction Survey (NSS-8) in six Norwegian neonatal intensive care units: a quantitative cross-sectional study

被引:6
|
作者
Hagen, Inger Hilde [1 ]
Svindseth, Marit Folsvik [1 ]
Nesset, Erik [1 ]
Orner, Roderick [2 ]
Iversen, Valentina Cabral [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Postbox 1517, N-6025 Alesund, Norway
[2] Univ Lincoln, Coll Social Sci, Lincoln LN6 7TS, Lincs, England
[3] St Olavs Univ Hosp HF, Tiller Dist Psychiat Ctr, Trondheim, Norway
[4] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Parents' satisfaction; NICU; Health care; Neonatal; Survey; Validity; Reliability; QUALITY-OF-CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PARENT SATISFACTION; PREMATURE BIRTH; PEDIATRIC CARE; EXPERIENCES; QUESTIONNAIRE; INSTRUMENT; HOSPITALS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-018-3031-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The experience of having their new-borns admitted to an intensive care unit (NICU) can be extremely distressing. Subsequent risk of post-incident-adjustment difficulties are increased for parents, siblings, and affected families. Patient and next of kin satisfaction surveys provide key indicators of quality in health care. Methodically constructed and validated survey tools are in short supply and parents' experiences of care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units is under-researched. This paper reports a validation of the Neonatal Satisfaction Survey (NSS-8) in six Norwegian NICUs. Methods: Parents' survey returns were collected using the Neonatal Satisfaction Survey (NSS-13). Data quality and psychometric properties were systematically assessed using exploratory factor analysis, tests of internal consistency, reliability, construct, convergent and discriminant validity. Each set of hospital returns were subjected to an apostasy analysis before an overall satisfaction rate was calculated. Results: The survey sample of 568 parents represents 45% of total eligible population for the period of the study. Missing data accounted for 1,1% of all returns. Attrition analysis shows congruence between sample and total population. Exploratory factor analysis identified eight factors of concern to parents,"Care and Treatment", "Doctors", "Visits", "Information", "Facilities", "Parents' Anxiety", "Discharge" and "Sibling Visits". All factors showed satisfactory internal consistency, good reliability (Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.70-0.94). For the whole scale of 51 items a 0.95. Convergent validity using Spearman's rank between the eight factors and question measuring overall satisfaction was significant on all factors. Discriminant validity was established for all factors. Overall satisfaction rates ranged from 86 to 90% while for each of the eight factors measures of satisfaction varied between 64 and 86%. Conclusion: The NSS-8 questionnaire is a valid and reliable scale for measuring parents' assessment of quality of care in NICU. Statistical analysis confirms the instrument's capacity to gauge parents' experiences of NICU. Further research is indicated to validate the survey questionnaire in other Nordic countries and beyond.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Neonatal Satisfaction Survey (NSS-8) in six Norwegian neonatal intensive care units: a quantitative cross-sectional study
    Inger Hilde Hagen
    Marit Følsvik Svindseth
    Erik Nesset
    Roderick Orner
    Valentina Cabral Iversen
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [2] Parental satisfaction with neonatal intensive care units: a quantitative cross-sectional study
    Inger Hilde Hagen
    Valentina Cabral Iversen
    Erik Nesset
    Roderick Orner
    Marit Følsvik Svindseth
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [3] Parental satisfaction with neonatal intensive care units: a quantitative cross-sectional study
    Hagen, Inger Hilde
    Iversen, Valentina Cabral
    Nesset, Erik
    Orner, Roderick
    Svindseth, Marit Folsvik
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [4] A cross-sectional survey of pain and pharmacological analgesia in Canadian Neonatal Intensive Care Units
    Johnston, CC
    Collinge, JM
    Henderson, SJ
    Anand, KJS
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1997, 13 (04): : 308 - 312
  • [5] Care practices and neonatal survival in 52 neonatal intensive care units in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, India: A cross-sectional study
    Hanson, Claudia
    Singh, Samiksha
    Zamboni, Karen
    Tyagi, Mukta
    Chamarty, Swecha
    Shukla, Rajan
    Schellenberg, Joanna
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (07)
  • [6] Neonatal nurses' knowledge and beliefs about kangaroo mother care in neonatal intensive care units: A descriptive, cross-sectional study
    Shattnawi, Khulood Kayed
    Al-Ali, Nahla
    Alnuaimi, Karimeh
    [J]. NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 21 (03) : 352 - 358
  • [7] Medication safety strategies in European adult, paediatric, and neonatal intensive care units: a cross-sectional survey
    Abdelaziz, Shahd
    Amigoni, Angela
    Kurttila, Minna
    Laaksonen, Raisa
    Silvari, Virginia
    Franklin, Bryony Dean
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2024,
  • [8] Prevalence and factors associated with neonatal hypothermia on admission to neonatal intensive care units in Southwest Ethiopia - A cross-sectional study
    Ukke, Gebresilasea Gendisha
    Diriba, Ketema
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):
  • [9] AF among Nurses Working in Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care Units: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Ali, Taibah M.
    Alharbi, Manal F.
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (16)
  • [10] Developmental care education in Australian surgical neonatal intensive care units: A cross-sectional study of nurses' perceptions
    Griffiths, Nadine
    Laing, Sharon
    Spence, Kaye
    Foureur, Maralyn
    Popat, Himanshu
    Hickey, Leah
    Sinclair, Lynn
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (10)