A Comprehensive Review of Canadian Marine Oil Spill Response System through the Lens of Decanting Regulations and Practices

被引:7
|
作者
Daisy, Naznin Sultana [1 ]
Hafezi, Mohammad Hesam [1 ]
Liu, Lei [1 ]
Lee, Kenneth [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil & Resource Engn, 5268 DaCosta Row, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
[2] Fisheries & Oceans Canada DFO, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
spill preparedness and response regime; decanting regulations and practices; marine oil spill response system; gaps in Canadian oil spill regulations;
D O I
10.3390/jmse10091310
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Marine oil spill response operations could generate a large volume of liquid oily wastes (e.g., emulsified oil, non-emulsified oil, and wastewater) that can be up to 30 to 40 times greater than the original volume of spilled oil. Oil decanting technologies are used globally for recovering spilled oil and handling liquid wastes. Canada follows the standards set out in the MARPOL 73/78 Annex 1 International regulations in most areas, with more strict discharge requirements in certain locations. For instance, inland waters discharge should not exceed 5 ppm, and in special areas, such as the Great Lakes, the discharge standard is under 0 ppm. In the event of an oil spill, decanted seawater should be barged to shore for disposal, which significantly constrains the response capacity and efficiency of oil recovery by skimmers due to limited temporary storage space in barges and the long time and high cost of transportation. This has become one of the greatest challenges the Canadian governments and oil spill response industries are facing in Canada. Moreover, when the spill response team decides that decanting is an appropriate way to handle the spilled oil, the approval process may take a long time, which negatively impacts the spill that has already occurred. Moreover, Canada uses a 10,000-tonne planning standard for oil spill preparedness, whereas the United States uses a worst-case scenario, and Europe uses a 60,000 m(3) planning standard. The existing planning threshold in Canada can cause the country to be not fully prepared when it comes to responding to a very large oil spill if one should occur. This study conducted a comprehensive review of the current Canadian oil spill response system and framework, regulations, roles and responsibilities of federal and provincial governments, existing decanting capabilities, and capacities of Canadian oil spill responders. More importantly, this study identified the gaps in the current oil spill response system and regulatory and technological barriers to oil decanting. Marine oil decanting regulations and practices in the US and selected European countries have also been reviewed to support addressing the challenges and improving the Canadian experience. It is expected that this study would help the stakeholders and professionals to better understand the oil spill response system and oil decanting status quo in Canada and facilitate Canadian governments and industries to better address the challenges in oil spill regulations and practices.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] A review of oil spill research in Canadian Arctic marine environments
    Heshka, Nicole E.
    Ridenour, Christine
    Saborimanesh, Nayereh
    Xin, Qin
    Farooqi, Hena
    Brydie, James
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2024, 209
  • [2] Green dispersants for oil spill response: A comprehensive review of recent advances
    Giwa, Adewale
    Chalermthai, Bushra
    Shaikh, Bismah
    Taher, Hanifa
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2023, 193
  • [3] The management in response to marine oil spill from ships in China: A systematic review
    Xiong, Shangao
    Long, Hualou
    Tang, Guoping
    Wan, Jun
    Li, Hongyuan
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2015, 96 (1-2) : 7 - 17
  • [4] The development and research of Geographical Information System of Marine Oil Spill Emergency Response
    Liu, Y
    Yin, P
    Shi, C
    Li, M
    Zhang, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2001, : 425 - 429
  • [5] Changes in the marine pollution management system in response to the Amorgos oil spill in Taiwan
    Chiau, WY
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2005, 51 (8-12) : 1041 - 1047
  • [6] Oil spill response capabilities and technologies for ice-covered Arctic marine waters: A review of recent developments and established practices
    Wilkinson, Jeremy
    Beegle-Krause, C. J.
    Evers, Karl-Ulrich
    Hughes, Nick
    Lewis, Alun
    Reed, Mark
    Wadhams, Peter
    AMBIO, 2017, 46 : 423 - 441
  • [7] Oil spill response capabilities and technologies for ice-covered Arctic marine waters: A review of recent developments and established practices
    Jeremy Wilkinson
    CJ Beegle-Krause
    Karl-Ulrich Evers
    Nick Hughes
    Alun Lewis
    Mark Reed
    Peter Wadhams
    Ambio, 2017, 46 : 423 - 441
  • [8] Plug and abandonment of oil and gas wells - A comprehensive review of regulations, practices, and related impact of materials selection
    Chukwuemeka, Augustine O.
    Oluyemi, Gbenga
    Mohammed, Auwalu I.
    Njuguna, James
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 226
  • [9] The research and development of simulation exercise system of marine oil spill crisis response based on GIS
    Liu, YC
    Yin, PH
    Zhang, J
    Ren, G
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2003, : 410 - 414
  • [10] Multi-user Online Three-Dimensional Marine Oil Spill Crisis Response System
    Li, Bingchan
    Ma, Hongtao
    Mao, Bo
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOPS AND SPECIAL SESSIONS: (WI-IAT WORKSHOP/SPECIAL SESSION 2021), 2021, : 17 - 21