PGE2 promotes breast cancer-associated lymphangiogenesis by activation of EP4 receptor on lymphatic endothelial cells

被引:61
|
作者
Nandi, Pinki [1 ]
Girish, Gannareddy V. [1 ]
Majumder, Mousumi [1 ,4 ]
Xin, Xiping [1 ]
Tutunea-Fatan, Elena [1 ]
Lala, Peeyush K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Oncol, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Childrens Hlth Res Inst, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[4] Brandon Univ, Dept Biol, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada
来源
BMC CANCER | 2017年 / 17卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
PGE2; Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2; Lymphangiogenesis; Angiognesis; EP4; receptors; antagonist; Breast cancer; Metastasis; Lymphatic endothelial cells; Directed in vivo lymphangiogenesis assay (DIVLA); INDOMETHACIN THERAPY; COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA; TUMOR PROGRESSION; PROSTAGLANDIN E-2; NODE METASTASES; UP-REGULATION; ANGIOGENESIS; COX-2; INHIBITORS; MURINE;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-016-3018-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Lymphatic metastasis, facilitated by lymphangiogenesis is a common occurrence in breast cancer, the molecular mechanisms remaining incompletely understood. We had earlier shown that cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression by human or murine breast cancer cells promoted lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis by upregulating VEGF-C/D production by tumor cells or tumor-associated macrophages primarily due to activation of the prostaglandin receptor EP4 by endogenous PGE2. It is not clear whether tumor or host-derived PGE2 has any direct effect on lymphangiogenesis, and if so, whether EP4 receptors on lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC) play any role. Methods: Here, we address these questions employing in vitro studies with a COX-2-expressing and VEGF-C/D-producing murine breast cancer cell line C3L5 and a rat mesenteric (RM) LEC line and in vivo studies in nude mice. Results: RMLEC responded to PGE2, an EP4 agonist PGE1OH, or C3L5 cell-conditioned media (C3L5-CM) by increased proliferation, migration and accelerated tube formation on growth factor reduced Matrigel. Native tube formation by RMLEC on Matrigel was abrogated in the presence of a selective COX-2 inhibitor or an EP4 antagonist. Addition of PGE2 or EP4 agonist, or C3L5-CM individually in the presence of COX-2 inhibitor, or EP4 antagonist, restored tube formation, reinforcing the role of EP4 on RMLEC in tubulogenesis. These results were partially duplicated with a human dermal LEC (HMVEC-dLyAd) and a COX-2 expressing human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Knocking down EP4 with shRNA in RMLEC abrogated their tube forming capacity on Matrigel in the absence or presence of PGE2, EP4 agonist, or C3L5-CM. RMLEC tubulogenesis following EP4 activation by agonist treatment was dependent on PI3K/Akt and Erk signaling pathways and VEGFR-3 stimulation. Finally in a directed in vivo lymphangiogenesis assay (DIVLA) we demonstrated the lymphangiogenic as well as angiogenic capacity of PGE2 and EP4 agonist in vivo. Discussion/conclusions: These results demonstrate the roles of tumor as well as host-derived PGE2 in inducing lymphangiogenesis, at least in part, by activating EP4 and VEGFR-3 on LEC. EP4 being a common target on both tumor and host cells contributing to tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis reaffirms the therapeutic value of EP4 antagonists in the intervention of lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PGE2 promotes breast cancer-associated lymphangiogenesis by activation of EP4 receptor on lymphatic endothelial cells
    Pinki Nandi
    Gannareddy V. Girish
    Mousumi Majumder
    Xiping Xin
    Elena Tutunea-Fatan
    Peeyush K. Lala
    BMC Cancer, 17
  • [2] Breast cancer-associated lymphangiogenesis: roles of PGE2 and EP4 receptor on lymphatic endothelial cells
    Lala, Peeyush K.
    Girish, Gannareddy V.
    Xin, Xiping
    Majumder, Mousumi
    Tutunea-Fatan, Elena
    Nandi, Pinki
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 74 (19)
  • [3] Prostaglandin E2 Receptor 4 (EP4) as a Therapeutic Target to Impede Breast Cancer-Associated Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis
    De Paz Linares, Guillermo Antonio
    Opperman, Reid Morgan
    Majumder, Mousumi
    Lala, Peeyush K.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 27
  • [4] PGE2 stimulates the expression of MOP via the EP4 receptor in colon cancer cells
    Chandramouli, Anupama
    Hutchinson, Anthony
    Shanas, Renee
    Davenport, Jennifer
    Owens, Janae
    Stankova, Lenka
    Bhattacharyya, Achyut
    Regan, John
    Nelson, Mark
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69
  • [5] Proneoplastic effects of PGE2 mediated by EP4 receptor in colorectal cancer
    Doherty, Glen A.
    Byrne, Sinead M.
    Molloy, Eamonn S.
    Malhotra, Vikrum
    Austin, Sandra C.
    Kay, Elaine W.
    Murray, Frank E.
    Fitzgerald, Desmond J.
    BMC CANCER, 2009, 9
  • [6] PGE2 promotes angiogenesis through EP4 and PKACγ pathway
    Zhang, Yushan
    Daaka, Yehia
    BLOOD, 2011, 118 (19) : 5355 - 5364
  • [7] The Role of PGE2 Receptor EP4 in Pathologic Ocular Angiogenesis
    Yanni, Susan E.
    Barnett, Joshua M.
    Clark, Monika L.
    Penn, John S.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (11) : 5479 - 5486
  • [8] Upregulation of the S1P3 receptor in metastatic breast cancer cells increases migration and invasion by induction of PGE2 and EP2/EP4 activation
    Filipenko, Iuliia
    Schwalm, Stephanie
    Reali, Luca
    Pfeilschifter, Josef
    Fabbro, Doriano
    Huwiler, Andrea
    Zangemeister-Wittke, Uwe
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY OF LIPIDS, 2016, 1861 (11): : 1840 - 1851
  • [9] ACTIVATION OF THE PGE2 RECEPTOR EP4 PROTECTS AGAINST OXIDANT-INDUCED APOPTOSIS IN AIRWAY EPITHELIAL CELLS
    Kalbfleisch, E.
    Jones, C.
    Cowley, E. A.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 249 - 249
  • [10] Synthesis and evaluation of γ-lactam analogs of PGE2 as EP4 and EP2/EP4 agonists
    Kambe, Tohru
    Maruyama, Toru
    Nakai, Yoshihiko
    Oida, Hiroji
    Maruyama, Takayuki
    Abe, Nobutaka
    Nishiura, Akio
    Nakai, Hisao
    Toda, Masaaki
    BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 20 (11) : 3502 - 3522