Three Mile Island: The driver of US nuclear power's decline?

被引:17
|
作者
Hultman, Nathan [1 ,2 ]
Koomey, Jonathan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Environm Policy Program, Sch Publ Policy, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Brookings Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Steyer Taylor Ctr Energy Policy & Finance, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
accident; cancellation; construction; Fukushima; industry; nuclear power; power plant; reactor; Three Mile Island; COSTS;
D O I
10.1177/0096340213485949
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
It is tempting to attribute variations in support for nuclear power to prominent accidents such as Three Mile Island in the United States or Fukushima in Japan. To illuminate how such attribution can be problematic, the authors discuss the historical context of the Three Mile Island accident in the United States. They point out that the US nuclear industry faced major challenges even before the 1979 accident: Forty percent of all US reactor cancellations between 1960 and 2010, they write, occurred before the accident in Pennsylvania. While safety concerns were undoubtedly a driver of public aversion to new nuclear construction in the United States, the nuclear industry already faced substantial economic and competitiveness obstacles, much like the nuclear industry worldwide before Fukushima.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条