Photoinduced Charge Transfer in Donor-Acceptor (DA) Copolymer: Fullerene Bis-adduct Polymer Solar Cells

被引:56
|
作者
Kang, Tae Eui [1 ]
Cho, Han-Hee [1 ]
Cho, Chul-Hee [1 ]
Kim, Ki-Hyun [1 ]
Kang, Hyunbum [1 ]
Lee, Myounghee [2 ]
Lee, Sunae [2 ]
Kim, BongSoo [3 ]
Im, Chan [2 ]
Kim, Bumjoon J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Taejon 305701, South Korea
[2] Konkuk Univ, Fraunhofer ISE Next Generat Solar Cell Res Ctr, Seoul 143701, South Korea
[3] Korea Inst Sci & Technol, Photoelect Hybrids Res Ctr, Seoul 136791, South Korea
关键词
photoinduced charge transfer; driving force for charge transfer (Delta G(CT)); donor-acceptor (DA) copolymer; fullerene bis-adduct; polymer solar cell; OPEN-CIRCUIT VOLTAGE; TRANSFER STATE; RECOMBINATION; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORT; BLENDS;
D O I
10.1021/am302479u
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Polymer solar cells (PSCs) consisting of fullerene bis-adduct and poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) blends have shown higher efficiencies than P3HT:phenyl C-61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) devices, because of the high-lying lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level of the fullerene bis-adducts. In contrast, the use of fullerene bis-adducts in donor-acceptor (DA) copolymer systems typically causes a decrease in the device's performance due to the decreased short-circuit current (J(SC)) and the fill factor (FF). However, the reason for such poor performance in DA copolymer:fullerene bis-adduct blends is not fully understood. In this work, bulk-heterojunction (BHJ)-type PSCs composed of three different electron donors with four different electron acceptors were chosen and compared. The three electron donors were (1) poly[(4,8-bis-(2-ethylhexyloxy)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']dithiophene)-2,6-diyl-alt-(5-octylthieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione)-1,3-diyl] (PBDTTPD), (2) poly[(4,8-bis-(2-ethylhexyloxy)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']dithiophene)-2,6-diyl-alt-(4-(2-ethylhexanoyl)-thieno[3,4-b]thiophene)-2,6-diyl] (PBDTTT-C), and (3) P3HT polymers. The four electron acceptors were (1) PCBM, (2) indene-C-60 monoadduct (ICMA), (3) indene-C-60 bis-adduct (ICBA), and (4) indene-C-60 tris-adduct (ICTA). To understand the difference in the performance of BHJ-type PSCs for the three different polymers in terms of the choice of fullerene acceptor, the structural, optical, and electrical properties of the blends were measured by the external quantum efficiency (EQE), photoluminescence, grazing incidence X-ray scattering, and transient absorption spectroscopy. We observed that while the molecular packing and optical properties cannot be the main reasons for the dramatic decrease in the PCE of the DA copolymers and ICBA, the value of the driving force for charge transfer (Delta G(CT)) is a key parameter for determining the change in J(SC) and device efficiency in the DA copolymer- and P3HT-based PSCs in terms of fullerene acceptor. The low EQE and Jsc in PBDTTPD and PBDTTT-C blended with ICBA and ICTA were attributed to an insufficient Delta G(CT) due to the higher LUMO levels of the fullerene multiadducts. Quantitative information on the efficiency of the charge transfer was obtained by comparing the polaron yield, lifetime, and exciton dissociation probability in the DA copolymer:fullerene acceptor films.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 868
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The interfacial degradation mechanism of polymer:fullerene bis-adduct solar cells and their stability improvement
    Yan, Lingpeng
    Gu, Huimin
    Li, Zerui
    Zhang, Jianqi
    Yang, Yongzhen
    Wang, Hua
    Liu, Xuguang
    Wei, Zhixiang
    Luo, Qun
    Ma, Chang-Qi
    [J]. MATERIALS ADVANCES, 2020, 1 (05): : 1307 - 1317
  • [2] Photoinduced charge transfer rates as a probe for characterizing donor-acceptor interfaces in polymer-based solar cells
    Dasgupta, Jyotishman
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 250
  • [3] Trimethylsilyl o-Xylenyl-Substituted Fullerene Bis-Adduct as Electron Acceptor for Solution-Processed Polymer Solar Cells
    Kim, Hee Un
    Park, On You
    Park, Jong Baek
    Hwang, Do-Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 16 (10) : 10465 - 10469
  • [4] Charge Separation and Recombination of Charge-Transfer Excitons in Donor-Acceptor Polymer Solar Cells
    Tsutsumi, Jun'ya
    Matsuzaki, Hiroyuki
    Kanai, Naoyuki
    Yamada, Toshikazu
    Hasegawa, Tatsuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2013, 117 (33): : 16769 - 16773
  • [5] Charge Transfer States in Organic Donor-Acceptor Solar Cells
    Vandewal, Koen
    Tvingstedt, Kristofer
    Inganas, Olle
    [J]. QUANTUM EFFICIENCY IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, PT II: FROM MOLECULAR AGGREGATES TO ORGANIC SOLAR CELLS, 2011, 85 : 261 - 295
  • [6] Wide-Bandgap Donor-Acceptor Copolymer Based on BDTTz Donor and TPD Acceptor for Polymer Solar Cells Using Fullerene and Nonfullerene Acceptors
    Keshtov, Muhammed L.
    Konstantinov, Igor O.
    Godovsky, Dimitri Y.
    Ostapov, Ilya E.
    Alekseev, Vladimir G.
    Agrawal, Anupam
    Dahiya, Hemraj
    Sharma, Ganesh D.
    [J]. ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [7] A Multifunctional Bis-Adduct Fullerene for Efficient Printable Mesoscopic Perovskite Solar Cells
    Tian, Chengbo
    Zhang, Shujing
    Mei, Anyi
    Rong, Yaoguang
    Hu, Yue
    Du, Kai
    Duan, Miao
    Sheng, Yusong
    Jiang, Pei
    Xu, Gengzhao
    Han, Hongwei
    [J]. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2018, 10 (13) : 10835 - 10841
  • [8] Photoinduced intramolecular charge transfer in donor-acceptor substituted tetrahydropyrenes
    Sumalekshmy, S
    Gopidas, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2004, 108 (12): : 3705 - 3712
  • [9] Role of the Charge Transfer State in Organic Donor-Acceptor Solar Cells
    Deibel, Carsten
    Strobel, Thomas
    Dyakonov, Vladimir
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2010, 22 (37) : 4097 - 4111
  • [10] Photoinduced Deadhesion of a Polymer Film Using a Photochromic Donor-Acceptor Stenhouse Adduct
    Mostafavi, Seyed Hossein
    Li, Wangxiang
    Clark, Kyle D.
    Stricker, Friedrich
    de Alaniz, Javier Read
    Bardeen, Christopher J.
    [J]. MACROMOLECULES, 2019, 52 (16) : 6311 - 6317