Business Model and Intellectual Capital. How to Release Intellectual Capital from SME's BM's?

被引:0
|
作者
Lindgren, Peter [1 ]
Saghaug, Kristin Falck [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Ind Prod, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Business Model; Business Model Innovation; Intellectual capital; releasing Intellectual capital; PRODUCT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
When practicing business model (BM) innovation releasing intellectual capital (IC) strategically from SME's BMs through the innovation process can be extremely difficult and complex to carry out especially to small and medium size enterprises (SME). There are so many opportunities and resources in SME's Intellectual Capital - but how to release them? Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a case study of BM and Intellectual Capital (IC) in practise in US and European SME's. It shows different methods carried out to release intellectual capital in SME's BM. We examined the SME's through a framework model, which we call the BMIL strategy canvas. The research approach is action research carried out over 4 years. Intense study of US and EU SME's and their different BM's form the empirical background. The findings represent learning and characteristic of BM and Intellectual Capital with reference to theory in BM, Business Model Innovation (BMI) and IC. Mapping our findings in the BMIL strategy canvas enabled us to get a better picture off SME's BMIL strategy and challenges to release Intellectual Capital. This was supported and followed up by some clearing questions so it was possible to register the BMIL strategy process and register also the output and impact of the SME's BMI and BMIL strategy. Originality/value - The research reveals that SME's focus often on very classic strategies and methods of releasing intellectual capital related to BMI. They focused in most cases on reactive "inside in" and reactive "outside in" methods and IC release strategies. SME's are at management level often primarily focusing on meeting needs and demands of an inside out pre chosen set of defined value proposition and user or customer group or reacting to a specific customer or market demand. Value proposition proposed and chosen are not always equivalent to values, wants and demands by users, customers and other "stakeholders" in the BM - and even own business. Practical implications SME's struggle with releasing highly potential and valuable IC because they cannot often see and sense their own values and IC together with the values demanded and IC offered by stakeholders and how to full fill them and release them. Common themes related to releasing IC among SME's specifically are 1) SME's carries out and try to release IC in very different ways 2) Some SME's are very structured about their release method and strategy - but most not 3) SME's focus in their BMIL on very few and often the same methods - often regardless of the actual specific BMI task and context 4) Potentials of BM's are therefore often left behind, often not found and IC are not capitalised upon 5) SME's lack BMI skills related to releasing IC in their BM's The outcomes of the application is an overview of different methods Strength, weakness, opportunities and threats related to releasing IC in BMI processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1907 / 1939
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Business models relations to Intellectual Capital: How to release Intellectual Capital from business BM's relations?
    Lindgren, Peter
    Rasmussen, Ole Horn
    Saghaug, Kristin Falck
    [J]. IFKAD 2013: 8TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: SMART GROWTH: ORGANIZATIONS, CITIES AND COMMUNITIES, 2013, : 1792 - 1815
  • [2] Perspectives on intellectual capital.
    Wilson, TD
    [J]. INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (01):
  • [3] Business model Eco systems and Intellectual Capital II. Why is Intellectual Capital from business BM's relations not released from a general Veblenian framework condition perspective?
    Rasmussen, Ole Horn
    Lindgren, Peter
    Saghaug, Kristin Falck
    [J]. IFKAD 2014: 9TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT MODELS FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, 2014, : 3880 - 3924
  • [4] Intellectual capital. A look from the perspective of stakeholders
    Mierzejewska, Beata
    [J]. E-MENTOR, 2006, (03): : 60 - 60
  • [5] Probing the impact of intellectual capital on SME efficiency: the role of business model innovation
    Khattak, Muhammad Sualeh
    Wu, Qiang
    Ahmad, Maqsood
    Anwar, Muhammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2024, 25 (2/3) : 613 - 639
  • [6] A Model for Intellectual Capital of Business Incubators
    Indiran, Logaiswari
    Khalifah, Zainab
    Ismail, Kamariah
    [J]. ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 23 (09) : 8450 - 8457
  • [7] SECTORAL EFFECTS OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL ON MALAYSIAN SME BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
    Muda, Salwa
    Rahman, Mara Ridhuan Che Abdul
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING JOURNAL, 2019, 14 (03): : 151 - 175
  • [8] Valuing Intellectual Capital. Multinationals and Taxhavens
    Walliser, Elisabeth
    [J]. COMPTABILITE CONTROLE AUDIT, 2015, 21 (02): : 130 - 132
  • [9] Model of Organization's Intellectual Capital Measurement
    Uziene, Lina
    [J]. INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2010, 21 (02): : 151 - 159
  • [10] Intellectual Capital - The Key for Sustainable Competitive Advantage for the SME's Sector
    Todericiu, Ramona
    Stanit, Alexandra
    [J]. 22ND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC CONFERENCE OF SIBIU 2015, IECS 2015 ECONOMIC PROSPECTS IN THE CONTEXT OF GROWING GLOBAL AND REGIONAL INTERDEPENDENCIES, 2015, 27 : 676 - 681