The construction and application of knowledge navigator model (KNM™): An evaluation of knowledge management maturity

被引:75
|
作者
Hsieh, Ping Jung [1 ]
Lin, Binshan [2 ]
Lin, Chinho [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Kaohsiung Normal Univ, Grad Inst Human Resource & Knowlegde Management, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Coll Business Adm, Shreveport, LA 71115 USA
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Ind & Informat Management, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Informat Management, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
关键词
Knowledge management; Knowledge navigator model (KNM (TM)); Inter-rater reliability analysis; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; ERP IMPLEMENTATION; STAGE MODEL; SYSTEMS; CREATION; PERFORMANCE; CAPABILITIES; INTEGRATION; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.005
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study develops a knowledge navigator model (KNM (TM)) to navigate knowledge management (KM) implementation journey. The KNM comprises two frameworks: evaluation and calculation framework. Qualitative research methods, including a literature review, in-depth interviews, focus groups and content analysis, are conducted to construct the evaluation framework of KNM. An algorithm model is proposed in the calculation framework and a 30 cases survey was employed to obtain the initial version of the score ranges used to differentiate maturity levels. Several propositions and the corresponding KNM were constructed. We define the KM maturity level into five stages: knowledge chaotic stage, knowledge conscientious stage, KM stage, KM advanced stage, and KM integration stage. The evaluation framework of KNM consists of three aspects: three target management objects (culture, KM process, and information technology), 68 KM activities, and 16 key areas (KAs). The initial version of the score ranges was identified. The study results can be referenced and the methodology can be applied to other countries, although the sample is confined to industries in Taiwan. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4087 / 4100
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The evolution of knowledge navigator model: The construction and application of KNM 2.0
    Hsieh, Ping Jung
    Lin, Chinho
    Chang, Shofang
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2020, 148
  • [2] Theory and Application of Knowledge Management Maturity Model
    Gai, Suxia
    Zhan, Wei
    Xu, Congwei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 2010, 2010, : 251 - +
  • [3] Building and Application of Personal Knowledge Management Maturity Comprehensive Evaluation Model
    Han, Xiaoying
    Chang, Dan
    Chen, Baowei
    [J]. LISS 2013, 2015, : 1111 - 1120
  • [4] Knowledge management maturity in construction companies
    Wibowo, Mochamad Agung
    Waluyo, Rudi
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING INNOVATION FOR A SUSTAINABLE, 2015, 125 : 89 - 94
  • [5] Development and Application of a General Knowledge Management Maturity Model
    Teah, Huan Ying
    Pee, Loo Geok
    Kankanhalli, Atreyi
    [J]. PACIFIC ASIA CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2006, SECTIONS 1-8, 2006, : 401 - 416
  • [6] An application of the knowledge management maturity model: the case of credit unions
    Serenko, Alexander
    Bontis, Nick
    Hull, Emily
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2016, 14 (03) : 338 - 352
  • [7] An Application of the Knowledge Management Maturity Model: The Case of Credit Unions
    Serenko, Alexander
    Bontis, Nick
    Hull, Emily
    [J]. AMCIS 2014 PROCEEDINGS, 2014,
  • [8] Constructing a knowledge management maturity model from perspective of knowledge management
    Feng, JW
    [J]. 2005 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, : 912 - 917
  • [9] Maturity model of transdisciplinary knowledge management
    Serna, Edgar M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 (06) : 647 - 654
  • [10] Knowledge Management Profile maturity model
    Gaal, Zoltan
    Szabo, Lajos
    Obermayer-Kovacs, Nora
    Kovacs, Zoltan
    Csepregi, Aniko
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2008, : 209 - 216