Safety of specific immunotherapy using a four-hour ultra-rush induction scheme in bee and wasp allergy

被引:0
|
作者
Roll, A [1 ]
Hofbauer, G [1 ]
Ballmer-Weber, BK [1 ]
Schmid-Grendelmeier, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Allergy Unit, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
ultra-rush immunotheraphy; Hymenoptera venom allergy; wasp; honeybee; side-effects; safety;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Ultra-rush induction of immunotherapy with Hymenoptera venom is a reliable and efficacious alternative to the rush induction protocol, though not widely used in European countries yet. Its safety, however, has been intensively discussed over the last few ears. The aim of this retrospective case Study was to examine the rate of allergic side-effects during Our four-hour ultra-rush hymenoptera venom induction regimen. We evaluated risk factors for observed side-effects Such as age, gender, severity of previous insect sting reactions according to the H.L. Mueller classification, concentration of venom inducing positive skin tests, level of specific IgE, serum tryptase concentration, and hymenoptera. venom used for treatment. Methods: 67 outpatients with Hymenoptera venom allergy received 80 Courses of ultra-rush immunotherapy. Diagnosis and selection of patients for venom immunotherapy were carried out according to the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. We applied a four-hour regimen, and local or systemic reactions were documented. Results: In 78 courses (97.5%) the maintenance dose of 111.1 mu g was reached within 4 hours and it was tolerated in 82.5% without any hypersensitivity reaction. Allergic side-effects were observed in only 17.5% (n=14): four severe local reactions (5%), eight grade I (10%) and two grade II (2.5%) systemic reactions. There was no significant difference in the number of systemic reactions comparing patients receiving wasp or honeybee venom extract. The number of systemic reactions was neither higher in patients with a severe prior insect sting, reaction (grade III or IV) nor dependent on age, gender, skin test reaction, level of specific IgE or tryptase. Epinephrine as rescue medication was never needed. Interestingly, patients with a severe prior wasp sting reaction showed a significantly lower incidence of allergic side-effects during ultra-rush immunotheraphy with wasp venom extract as compared to grade III or IV honeybee venom allergic patients. Conclusion: Our ultra-rush immunotherapy induction regimen shows a low incidence of systemic reactions. It proved to be safe and convenient for the patient, as it could be applied in a four-hour outpatient regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 85
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Safety of specific immunotherapy using an ultra-rush induction regimen in bee and wasp allergy
    Bozek, Andrzej
    Kolodziejczyk, Krzysztof
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2018, 14 (02) : 288 - 291
  • [2] Safety of specific immunotherapy using ultra-rush 150-min induction scheme in hymenoptera venom allergy
    Kopae, P.
    Zidarn, M.
    Bajrovic, N.
    Erzen, R.
    Adamie, K.
    Kosnik, M.
    Music, E.
    ALLERGY, 2009, 64 : 455 - 455
  • [3] Immunotherapy in pediatric patients with respiratory allergy: ultra-rush induction scheme
    Luz, S.
    Geraldo Dias, J.
    Palma Carlos, S.
    Leiria Pinto, P.
    ALLERGY, 2011, 66 : 210 - 210
  • [4] Tolerability and Safety of a 3-day Ultra-Rush Immunotherapy with Bee and Wasp Venom Allergy with internal Medical Comorbidities
    Bernkopf, K.
    Schmitt, J.
    Spornraft-Ragaller, P.
    Bauer, A.
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2011, 9 : 166 - 166
  • [5] Safety and tolerability of venom immunotherapy: Evaluation of 581 rush- and ultra-rush induction protocols (safety of rush and ultra-rush venom immunotherapy)
    Stock, Richard
    Fischer, Tatjana
    Assmus, Katharina
    Zoeller, Nadja
    Ackermann, Hanns
    Kaufmann, Roland
    Meissner, Markus
    Valesky, Eva
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2021, 14 (01):
  • [6] Safety and tolerability of ultra-rush induction, less than one hour, of sublingual immunotherapy in children
    Tripodi, S
    Businco, AD
    Benincori, N
    Scala, G
    Pingitore, G
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 139 (02) : 149 - 152
  • [7] Safety and efficacy of tree pollens specific immunotherapy on ultra-rush method
    Bozek, A.
    Jarzab, J.
    ALLERGY, 2013, 68 : 481 - 481
  • [8] Safety and efficacy of tree pollens specific immunotherapy on ultra-rush method
    Bozek, A.
    ALLERGY, 2014, 69 : 158 - 158
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of grass pollen specific immunotherapy using ultra-rush protocol and Purethal vaccine
    Bozek, Andrzej
    Jarzab, Jerzy
    ALERGIA ASTMA IMMUNOLOGIA, 2012, 17 (04): : 197 - 201
  • [10] Safety of ultra-rush titration of sublingual immunotherapy in asthmatic children with tree-pollen allergy
    Moesges, Ralph
    Graute, Vera
    Christ, Hildegard
    Sieber, Hans-Jochen
    Wahn, Ulrich
    Niggemann, Bodo
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 21 (08) : 1135 - 1138