Using neural networks to assess flight deck human-automation interaction

被引:5
|
作者
Sullivan, K. B. [1 ]
Feigh, K. M. [1 ]
Mappus, R. [1 ]
Durso, F. T. [1 ]
Fischer, U. [1 ]
Pop, V. [1 ]
Mosier, K. L. [2 ]
Morrow, D. G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] San Francisco State Univ, San Francisco, CA 94132 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Champaign Urbanna, IL USA
关键词
Neural network; Human-automation interaction; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2012.12.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The increased complexity and interconnectivity of flight deck automation has made the prediction of human-automation interaction (HAI) difficult and has resulted in a number of accidents and incidents. There is a need to develop objective and robust methods by which the changes in HAI brought about by the introduction of new automation into the flight deck could be predicted and assessed prior to implementation and without use of extensive simulation. This paper presents a method to model a parametrization of flight deck automation known as HART and link it to HAI consequences using a backpropagation neural network approach. The transformation of the HART into a computational model suitable for modeling as a neural network is described. To test and train the network data were collected from 40 airline pilots for six HAI consequences based on one scenario family consisting of a baseline and four variants. For a binary classification of HAI consequences, the neural network successfully classified 62-78.5% depending on the consequence. The results were verified using a decision tree analysis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 35
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using Neural Networks to Assess Human-Automation Interaction
    Sullivan, Katlyn
    Feigh, Karen
    Durso, Francis
    Fischer, Ute
    Morrow, Dan
    Mosier, Kathy
    Blosch, Justin
    Pop, Vlad
    [J]. 2011 IEEE/AIAA 30TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2011,
  • [2] USING NEURAL NETWORKS TO ASSESS HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTION
    Sullivan, Katlyn B.
    Feigh, Karen M.
    Durso, Francis T.
    Fischer, Ute
    Pop, Vlad L.
    Mosier, Kathleen
    Blosch, Justin
    Morrow, Dan
    [J]. 2011 IEEE/AIAA 30TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2011,
  • [3] The Activated Failures of Human-Automation Interactions on the Flight Deck
    Li, Wen-Chin
    Greaves, Matthew
    Durando, Davide
    Lin, John J. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS AND AVIATION, 2016, 48 (03): : 163 - 171
  • [4] Formal verification of human-automation interaction
    Degani, A
    Heymann, M
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2002, 44 (01) : 28 - 43
  • [5] History and future of human-automation interaction
    Janssen, Christian P.
    Donker, Stella F.
    Brumby, Duncan P.
    Kun, Andrew L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2019, 131 : 99 - 107
  • [6] Intent Inference-Based Flight-Deck Human-Automation Mode-Confusion Detection
    Lee, Sangjin
    Hwang, Inseok
    Leiden, Kenneth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 12 (08): : 503 - 518
  • [7] Using formal verification to evaluate human-automation interaction: A review
    Bolton, Matthew L.
    Bass, Ellen J.
    Siminiceanu, Radu I.
    [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2013, 43 (03) : 488 - 503
  • [8] Using Formal Verification to Evaluate Human-Automation Interaction: A Review
    Bolton, Matthew L.
    Bass, Ellen J.
    Siminiceanu, Radu I.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2013, 43 (03): : 488 - 503
  • [9] Challenges in implementation of human-automation interaction models
    Fereidunian, Alireza
    Lucas, Caro
    Lesani, Hamid
    Lehtonen, Matti
    Nordman, Mikael
    [J]. 2007 MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL & AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 1266 - +
  • [10] The role of social support in human-automation interaction
    Sauer, Juergen
    Sonderegger, Andreas
    Semmer, Norbert K.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2024, 67 (06) : 732 - 743