Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion aided with computer-assisted spinal navigation system combined with electromyography monitoring

被引:9
|
作者
Luo Wei [1 ]
Zhang Fan [2 ]
Liu Tie [3 ]
Du Xing-li [1 ]
Chen An-ming [1 ]
Li Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] San Xia Univ, Dept Orthopaed, People Hosp Yichang 1, Yichang 443000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
minimally invasive spine surgery; computer-assisted navigation; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; electromyographic monitoring; PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT; INSERTION; ACCURACY; FIXATION; SURGERY; TLIF;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.22.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Minimally invasive techniques are gaining wide-spread application in lumbar fusion surgery, because they may have advantage over conventional open surgery in approach-related morbidity. This research was aimed to evaluate the safety and accuracy of the techniques of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by using a computer-assisted spinal navigation system combined with electromyography monitoring. Methods Sixteen patients underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. A computer-assisted spinal navigation system and electromyography were used for guiding pedicle screw placement. The operative duration, blood loss, complications, and fluoroscopic time were recorded. Clinical outcome was assessed by Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index. Radiographic images were obtained to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and fusion rates. Results The Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were vastly improved postoperatively. A total of 64 pedicle screws were implanted and three were regarded as misplacement by post-operative CT scan. Three screw trajectories were adjusted according to intra-operative stimulus-evoked electromyography monitoring. The average fluoroscopy time in each patient was 31.8 seconds, which equals to 7.9 seconds per pedicle screw. No patients had instrument related neurological complications, infection, implant failure or revision. Successful fusion was found in all patients. Conclusions The combination of navigation system and real-time electromyography monitoring can make the minimally invasive operation more safe and accurate while decreasing radiation exposure time of the medical staff and patient and minimizing the chance and the degree of the pedicle screw misplacement. Chin Med J 2012;125(22):3947-3951
引用
收藏
页码:3947 / 3951
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion aided with computer-assisted spinal navigation system combined with electromyography monitoring
    LUO Wei
    ZHANG Fan
    LIU Tie
    DU Xing-li
    CHEN An-ming
    LI Feng
    [J]. 中华医学杂志(英文版), 2012, (22) : 3947 - 3951
  • [2] Intraoperative electromyography monitoring in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Bindal, Rajesh K.
    Ghosh, Subrata
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 6 (02) : 126 - 132
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [4] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Hoffmann, Christoph-Heinrich
    Kandziora, Frank
    [J]. OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (03): : 180 - 191
  • [5] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Stadler, James A., III
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (02) : 377 - +
  • [6] Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better Than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Tian, Wei
    Xu, Yun-Feng
    Liu, Bo
    Liu, Ya-Jun
    He, Da
    Yuan, Qiang
    Lang, Zhao
    Han, Xiao-Guang
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (06): : 237 - 242
  • [7] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Elboghdady, Islam M.
    Naqvi, Abbas
    Jorgenson, Anton Y.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [8] Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis
    Peng, Peng
    Chen, Kangwu
    Chen, Hao
    Zhang, Kai
    Sun, Jiajia
    Yang, Peng
    Zhou, Feng
    Liu, Yu
    Yang, Huilin
    Mao, Haiqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2020, 20 : 107 - 112
  • [9] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis
    Tsahtsarlis, Antonio
    Wood, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) : 858 - 861
  • [10] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Badlani, Neil
    Yu, Elizabeth
    Kreitz, Tyler
    Khan, Safdar
    Kurd, Mark F.
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (02): : 62 - 64