We test the frequently made claim that SRI funds are conventional funds in disguise. For this purpose, we compare the portfolio holdings of SRI funds to conventional funds with respect to their social and environmental standards. Our empirical study of US equity funds shows that SRI funds have a significantly higher ethical ranking than standard funds, i.e., they are not conventional funds in disguise. This result holds for all ethical criteria we investigate. It is stable over time and holds after controlling for several fund characteristics. Finally, we find no evidence that our result is generated by window dressing strategies of SRI funds.
机构:
US State Dept, Off Res, Commonwealth Branch, Washington, DC 20520 USA
George Washington Univ, Russian Hist, Washington, DC USA
Kennan Inst Adv Russian Studies, Washington, DC USAUS State Dept, Off Res, Commonwealth Branch, Washington, DC 20520 USA
Grant, Steven A.
SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW,
2020,
98
(02):
: 298
-
+
机构:
Department of Management, King’s College London, University of London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, LondonDepartment of Management, King’s College London, University of London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London
Plangger K.
Kietzmann J.H.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, 500 Granville Street, VancouverDepartment of Management, King’s College London, University of London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London
Kietzmann J.H.
Pitt L.F.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, 500 Granville Street, VancouverDepartment of Management, King’s College London, University of London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London
Pitt L.F.
Berthon P.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
McCallum Graduate School of Business, Bentley College, Waltham, MADepartment of Management, King’s College London, University of London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London