Bioremediation of arsenic-contaminated soil through soil washing using biosurfactants

被引:0
|
作者
Coelho, Ricardo Silva [1 ]
Teixeira, Monica Cristina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ouro Preto, Programa Posgrad Engn Ambiental, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Ouro Preto, Programa Posgrad Engn Ambiental, Escola Farm, Dept Farm, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
关键词
arsenic; bioremediation; biosurfactant; soil; NATURAL SURFACTANT; REMOVAL; MOBILIZATION; BEHAVIOR; SAPONIN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Gold mining is one of the main sources of Arsenic (As) contamination in Minas Gerais, particularly at the Iron quadrangle. Arsenic is a toxic element that causes damage to human health. The soil washing technique using biosurfactants (BS) containing extracts was tested to promote the mobilization of the As contained in some soil samples collected in an abandoned gold mine, to investigate an environmentally friendly but equally efficient alternative to remove As from soils. Two mixed cultures of biosurfactant-producing bacteria (MPCB and MPBR), both adapted to the cultivation at high As concentrations (8 mg.1), were selected for extracts production. Surfactants were stable over a wide pH range, 3-11; temperature, 28-50 C and salinity, 1-5% NaCI (p.v"), and promoted the mobilization of As. The pH and solid:liquid ratio influenced the removal efficiency of the tested extracts. The highest removals were obtained at pH 11.0 and a solid:liquid ratio of 1:40 (g.m1). Under pH 11.0, the arsenic removal results obtained with MPCB (14.01 and 13.72%) and MPBR extracts (12.04 and 12.31%) were superior to those obtained by using 10o (w/v) solutions of the commercial surfactants SDS (0.87 and 0.71%), saponin (0.57 and 0.55%) and, soy lecithin (2.05 and 2.63%). The pH and the solid: liquid ratio influenced the results of the column tests. The highest As removals: 25.43% (MPCB) and 22.43% (MPBR) were obtained after 10 extraction cycles, at pH 11 and 1:40 ratio (.m1). The extracts MPCB and MPBR removed the water-soluble arsenic as well as the carbonate associated As and the adsorbed ions. Both extracts behaved similarly to EDTA and the commercial microbial extract (GorduraKlin8).
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 553
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Acid washing and stabilization of an artificial arsenic-contaminated soil
    Tokunaga, S
    Hakuta, T
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2002, 46 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [3] An evaluation of different soil washing solutions for remediating arsenic-contaminated soils
    Wang, Yiwen
    Ma, Fujun
    Zhang, Qian
    Peng, Changsheng
    Wu, Bin
    Li, Fasheng
    Gu, Qingbao
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2017, 173 : 368 - 372
  • [4] Extraction of arsenic in a synthetic arsenic-contaminated soil using phosphate
    Alam, MGM
    Tokunaga, S
    Maekawa, T
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2001, 43 (08) : 1035 - 1041
  • [5] Arsenic bioaccumulation in arsenic-contaminated soil: a review
    Al-Makishah, N. H.
    Abu Taleb, Md
    Barakat, M. A.
    [J]. CHEMICAL PAPERS, 2020, 74 (09) : 2743 - 2757
  • [6] Remediation of Smelter Contaminated Soil by Sequential Washing Using Biosurfactants
    Gusiatin, Zygmunt Mariusz
    Kumpiene, Jurate
    Carabante, Ivan
    Radziemska, Maja
    Brtnicky, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (24)
  • [7] Arsenic bioaccumulation in arsenic-contaminated soil: a review
    N. H. Al-Makishah
    Md. Abu Taleb
    M. A. Barakat
    [J]. Chemical Papers, 2020, 74 : 2743 - 2757
  • [8] Evaluation on bioaccessibility of arsenic in the arsenic-contaminated soil
    Su-Jin Min
    Hye-Bin Kim
    Seon-Hee Kim
    Kitae Baek
    [J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 36 : 1780 - 1784
  • [9] Evaluation on bioaccessibility of arsenic in the arsenic-contaminated soil
    Min, Su-Jin
    Kim, Hye-Bin
    Kim, Seon-Hee
    Baek, Kitae
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 36 (11) : 1780 - 1784
  • [10] Biosurfactants are useful tools for the bioremediation of contaminated soil: a review
    Bustamante, M.
    Duran, N.
    Diez, M. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2012, 12 (04) : 667 - 687