Life cycle analysis methodology incorporating private and social costs

被引:0
|
作者
Clark, JP
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A key question for life cycle analysis has been the translation of the inventory phase of the analysis into results usable in a business environment to make product decisions. The methods routinely used to translate the many dimensions of a life cycle inventory into a single ''score'' or measure of performance have been regularly challenged on a wide range of bases. However, these criticisms fail to recognize the inherent normative nature of the exercise, where the only relevant criterion for success is the ability make a discrete choice from a limited set of alternatives, rather than identifying the ''best'' possible action. The need to discriminate among alternatives, rather than to optimize globally, should allow the analyst to approach the problem of life cycle analysis from a more practical perspective. This premise is tested through the application of a proposed methodology that provides a set of broad ranges of value, in $/kg of every emission, based on aggregate willingness to pay to avoid the environmental impacts of each pollutant. The ranges include scientific uncertainty, variation in context or location, and a large range of possible values for parameters that have a subjective component. The $/kg ranges can be applied to the life cycle inventories of products to produce measures of overall environmental impact. Often, these ranges are sufficient to determine which is the best of several product or process alternatives. Finally, the methodology provides a quick guide to which pollutants and parameters are the most important, which makes conclusions more transparent, and it helps focuses further analysis for decision making, if no conclusion emerges initially. This kind of methodology can be very useful if the $/kg estimates are reliable. The first half of this paper develops how the ranges were derived. Any potential user needs to understand the notions of value employed; which effects are included and which are not, what the assumptions are, and how the answers can be modified. The second half of the paper demonstrates the application of the methodology to an automotive fender case study.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation Analysis of Capital and Life Cycle Costs in Private Financial Initiative Projects
    Wang, Nannan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 30 (05)
  • [2] A methodology for evaluating pintle system life cycle costs
    Morris, J
    [J]. THIRTY-SIXTH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM SAFE ASSOCIATION, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 516 - 523
  • [3] METHODOLOGY PROPOSAL FOR THE INTEGRATION OF LIFE CYCLE COSTS IN PRONIC
    Simoes, Catarina
    Falcao da Silva, Maria Joao
    Couto, Paula
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MATERIALS IN DESIGN (M2D2017), 2017, : 1313 - 1314
  • [4] A Methodology for Robust Comparative Life Cycle Assessments Incorporating Uncertainty
    Gregory, Jeremy R.
    Noshadravan, Arash
    Olivetti, Elsa A.
    Kirchain, Randolph E.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (12) : 6397 - 6405
  • [5] Incorporating Costs of Life-Cycle Impacts into Transportation Program Development
    Hameed, Faisal
    Hancock, Kathleen
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2014, (2453) : 77 - 83
  • [6] Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Deteriorating Civil Infrastructures Incorporating Social Sustainability
    Wang, Zhujun
    Dong, You
    Jin, Weiliang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2021, 27 (03)
  • [7] PRIVATE AND SOCIAL COSTS
    JURGENSEN, H
    [J]. GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1964, 2 (04): : 273 - 288
  • [8] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF FACILITIES LIFE CYCLE COSTS
    Marenjak, Sasa
    Krstic, Hrvoje
    [J]. TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2010, 17 (04): : 481 - 487
  • [9] Sensitivity analysis of facilities life cycle costs
    Marenjak, Saša
    Krstić, Hrvoje
    [J]. Tehnicki Vjesnik, 2010, 17 (04): : 481 - 487
  • [10] INCORPORATING LIFE-CYCLE COSTS IN HIGHWAY-BRIDGE PLANNING AND DESIGN
    MOHAMMADI, J
    GURALNICK, SA
    YAN, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (05): : 417 - 424