Cryogenic vs. absorption biogas upgrading in liquefied biomethane production - An energy efficiency analysis

被引:51
|
作者
Hashemi, Sayed Ebrahim [1 ]
Sarker, Shiplu [1 ]
Lien, Kristian M. [1 ]
Schnell, Sondre K. [2 ]
Austbo, Bjorn [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Liquefied biomethane; Cryogenic upgrading; Chemical absorption upgrading; Methane utilization; SWING ADSORPTION; LNG; CO2; PURIFICATION; EXERGY; DESIGN; LIQUEFACTION; OPTIMIZATION; PERSPECTIVES; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.172
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Production of liquefied biomethane (LBM) from biogas comprises two major energy intensive processes; upgrading to increase the methane concentration and refrigeration to liquefy the upgraded biogas. Amine-based absorption has been considered an attractive option for biogas upgrading in industrial applications. The temperature increase associated with amine regeneration is, however, in conflict with the cooling requirement of the subsequent liquefaction process. Hence, cryogenic biogas upgrading, integrated with liquefaction, has emerged as an interesting alternative. In this paper, a rigorous energy analysis was performed for comprehensive models of the two aforementioned LBM production alternatives. Both processes were modeled using Aspen HYSYS (R) and optimized to minimize the energy use. The results indicate that the integrated cryogenic upgrading process is favorable in terms of both overall energy efficiency and methane utilization. Moreover, the energy analysis implies that the liquefaction process accounts for the major part of the energy input to an LBM plant, demonstrating the significance of improving the energy efficiency of the liquefaction process in order to improve the overall performance of the LBM process.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 304
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biogas to liquefied biomethane via cryogenic upgrading technologies
    Pellegrini, Laura Annamaria
    De Guido, Giorgia
    Lange, Stefano
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 124 : 75 - 83
  • [2] Direct vs. indirect biogas methanation for liquefied biomethane production: A concept evaluation
    Hashemi, Sayed Ebrahim
    Wijnsma, Sander
    Hillestad, Magne
    Austbo, Bjorn
    FUEL, 2024, 371
  • [3] PRESSURELESS CRYOGENIC CONVERSION OF BIOGAS INTO LIQUEFIED BIOMETHANE AND SOLID CARBON DIOXIDE
    Hofmann, J.
    Nachtmann, K.
    Falk, O.
    Baum, S.
    Fuchsz, M.
    PAPERS OF THE 24TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2016, : 1067 - 1073
  • [4] Cryogenic Technologies Based on Stirling Machines for Liquefied Biomethane Production
    N. G. Kirillov
    Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 2002, 38 : 667 - 671
  • [5] Cryogenic technologies based on stirling machines for liquefied biomethane production
    Kirillov, NG
    CHEMICAL AND PETROLEUM ENGINEERING, 2002, 38 (11-12) : 667 - 671
  • [6] Cryogenic technologies based on sterling machines for liquefied biomethane production
    Kirillov, N.G.
    Khimicheskoe I Neftegazovoe Mashinostroenie, 2002, (11): : 18 - 19
  • [7] Upgrading biogas to biomethane and liquid CO2: A novel cryogenic process
    Yousef, Ahmed M.
    El-Maghlany, Wael M.
    Eldrainy, Yehia A.
    Attia, Abdelhamid
    FUEL, 2019, 251 : 611 - 628
  • [8] Energy, Exergy, and Economic Analysis of Cryogenic Distillation and Chemical Scrubbing for Biogas Upgrading and Hydrogen Production
    Naeiji, Esfandiyar
    Noorpoor, Alireza
    Ghanavati, Hossein
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [9] Scenarios for upgrading and distribution of compressed and liquefied biogas - Energy, environmental, and economic analysis
    Gustafsson, Marcus
    Cruz, Igor
    Svensson, Niclas
    Karlsson, Magnus
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 256
  • [10] Performance analysis of membrane separation for upgrading biogas to biomethane at small scale production sites
    Peppers, Joshua
    Li, Yin
    Xue, Jian
    Chen, Xiguang
    Alaimo, Christopher
    Wong, Luann
    Young, Thomas
    Green, Peter G.
    Jenkins, Bryan
    Zhang, Ruihong
    Kleeman, Michael J.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2019, 128