Revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with significantly higher opioid consumption as compared to primary total hip arthroplasty in the acute postoperative period

被引:4
|
作者
Bernstein, Jenna A. [1 ]
Feng, James [1 ]
Mahure, Siddharth A. [1 ]
Schwarzkopf, Ran [1 ]
Long, William J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone, Div Orthoped Adult Joint Reconstruct, New York, NY USA
[2] Insall Scott Kelly Inst, 260 East 66th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Opioid use; postoperative pain; revision total hip; MULTIMODAL PAIN MANAGEMENT; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.1177/1120700020938324
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There are currently a lack of investigations that characterised narcotic utilisation following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). We sought to determine if immediate post-surgical opioid use was different between revision THA and primary THA. Methods: A single institution total joint arthroplasty database was used to identify adult patients who underwent revision THA or primary THA from 2016 to 2019. Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were calculated for different time periods. Results: 6977 patients were identified, 89.72% primary THA and 10.28% revision THA. Aggregate opioid consumption was higher for revision THA patients (317.40 MME vs. 93.01 MME), as was opioid consumption in the first 24 hour and second 24-hour periods. Visual analogue pain (VAS) scores were significantly higher in the 0-12 hour postoperative and the 12-24 hours postoperative periods in the revision THA group. Conclusions: Patients undergoing revision THA had significantly higher narcotic utilisation than those undergoing primary THA, particularly in the first 24 hours postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 63
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conversion total hip arthroplasty: Primary or revision total hip arthroplasty
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    Baghoolizadeh, Mahta
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 6 (10): : 750 - 753
  • [2] Revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with poorer clinically meaningful improvements and patient satisfaction compared to primary total hip arthroplasty
    Zhang, Siyuan
    Chen, Jerry Yongqiang
    Pang, Hee Nee
    Lo, Ngai Nung
    Yeo, Seng Jin
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 28 : 96 - 100
  • [3] A Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not a Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Raiford, Mattie E.
    Barra, Matthew F.
    Myers, Thomas G.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 29 (03)
  • [4] Preoperative Opioid Use Is Associated with Higher Readmission and Revision Rates in Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Weick, Jack
    Bawa, Harpreet
    Dirschl, Douglas R.
    Luu, Hue H.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (14): : 1171 - 1176
  • [5] Revision total hip arthroplasty
    Lakstein, D.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2010, 61 (01) : 51 - 65
  • [6] Revision total hip arthroplasty
    Sporer, SM
    Paprosky, WG
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (417) : 203 - 209
  • [7] Increased arthroplasty surgeon energy consumption when performing primary total hip arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty
    Coden, Gloria
    Schoeller, Lauren
    Miller, James Penn
    Talmo, Carl
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 53 : 147 - 149
  • [8] Total hip arthroplasty after osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures compared to primary Total hip arthroplasty
    Schleicher, Alisa
    Neidenbach, Philipp
    Blumel, Stefan
    Leunig, Michael
    Rudiger, Hannes
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2021, 151 : 22S - 22S
  • [9] Obesity is associated with higher complication rates in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Kennedy, John W.
    Young, David
    Meek, Dominic R. M.
    Patil, Sanjeev R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 15 (01) : 70 - 72
  • [10] Inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty surgery: A comparison of revision and primary total hip arthroplasty
    Walker, WC
    Keyser-Marcus, LA
    Cifu, DX
    Chaudhri, M
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (01): : 129 - 133