The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19

被引:121
|
作者
Hu, Kaihui [1 ]
Fan, Jing [1 ]
Li, Xueqin [1 ]
Gou, Xin [1 ]
Li, Xinyuan [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, 1 Yixueyuan Rd, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Key Lab Mol Oncol & Epigenet, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
2019-nCoV coronavirus disease 2019; adverse skin reactions; health care workers; personal protective equipment; LATEX; OUTBREAK;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000020603
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In December 2019, a new coronavirus was found in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, and spread rapidly throughout the country, attracting global attention. On February 11, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially named the disease caused by 2019-nCoV coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). With the increasing number of cases, health care workers (HCWs) from all over China volunteered to work in Hubei Province. Because of the strong infectivity of COVID-19, HCWs need to wear personal protective equipment (PPE), such as N95 masks, latex gloves, and protective clothing. Due to the long-term use of PPE, many adverse skin reactions may occur. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the adverse skin reactions among HCWs using PPE. Questionnaires were used for the research; a quantitative study was carried out to determine the incidence of adverse skin reactions among HCWs using PPE. A total of 61 valid questionnaires were collected. The most common adverse skin reactions among HCWs wearing N95 masks were nasal bridge scarring (68.9%) and facial itching (27.9%). The most common adverse skin reactions among HCWs wearing latex gloves were dry skin (55.7%), itching (31.2%), and rash (23.0%). The most common adverse skin reactions among HCWs wearing protective clothing were dry skin (36.1%) and itching (34.4%). When most HCWs wear PPE for a long period of time, they will experience adverse skin reactions. The incidence of adverse skin reactions to the N95 mask was 95.1%, that to latex gloves was 88.5%, and that to protective clothing was 60.7%.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic in Italian health care workers
    Proietti, Ilaria
    Borrelli, Ivan
    Skroza, Nevena
    Santoro, Paolo Emilio
    Gualano, Maria Rosaria
    Bernardini, Nicoletta
    Mambrin, Alessandra
    Tolino, Ersilia
    Marchesiello, Anna
    Marraffa, Federica
    Michelini, Simone
    Rossi, Giovanni
    Volpe, Salvatore
    Ricciardi, Walter
    Moscato, Umberto
    Potenza, Concetta
    DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, 2022, 35 (06)
  • [2] Italian health care workers and Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during Covid-19 pandemic
    Santoro, Paolo Emilio
    Proietti, Ilaria
    Borrelli, Ivan
    Gualano, Maria Rosaria
    Rossi, Maria Francesca
    Amantea, Carlotta
    Daniele, Alessandra
    Potenza, Concetta
    Ricciardi, Walter
    Moscato, Umberto
    SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2022, 13 : S162 - S162
  • [3] Health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: prevalence of adverse skin reactions from using protective equipment
    Westermann, Claudia
    Altenburg, Christiane
    Dulon, Madeleine
    Kleinmuller, Olaf
    Zielinski, Nika
    Nienhaus, Albert
    SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2022, 13 : S179 - S180
  • [4] Occupational skin dermatoses among health care workers: A review of adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment
    Sari, Agnes Rosarina Prita
    Patria, Yudha Nur
    Wiguna, Olivia Roselin
    Soebono, Hardyanto
    Febriana, Sri Awalia
    DERMATOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [5] Personal protective equipment modification by health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Trepanowski, Nicole
    Meltzer, Rachel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 87 (03) : AB191 - AB191
  • [6] Adverse Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment Among Health-Care Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study in Indonesia
    Christopher Paulus Mario
    Roren Regina Stefani
    Tania Clarissa
    Jayadi Nana Novia
    Cucunawangsih Cucunawangsih
    International Journal of Dermatology And Venereology, 2020, 03 (04) : 211 - 218
  • [7] Personal protective equipment (PPE) related adverse skin reactions among healthcare workers at the main COVID-19 isolation center in Barbados
    Bharatha, Ambadasu
    Krishnamurthy, Kandamaran
    Cohall, Damian
    Rahman, Sayeeda
    Forde, Corey A.
    Corbin-Harte, Rhea
    Ojeh, Nkemcho
    Kabir, Russell
    Parsa, Ali Davod
    Rabbi, Ahbab Mohammad Fazle
    Majumder, Md Anwarul Azim
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [8] Prevalence of Adverse Skin Reactions in Nursing Staff Due to Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Westermann, Claudia
    Zielinski, Nika
    Altenburg, Christiane
    Dulon, Madeleine
    Kleinmueller, Olaf
    Kersten, Jan Felix
    Nienhaus, Albert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [9] Skin problems associated with using of personal protective equipment in COVID-19 intensive care units
    Altin, Leyla
    Akbiyik, Ayse
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 28 (06) : 985 - 995
  • [10] Life inside Personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic
    Chaudhary, Kriti
    Kumari, Kamlesh
    Syal, Rashmi
    Kumar, Rakesh
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 11 (06) : 3384 - 3385