Willingness to accept compensation for the environmental risks of oil transport on the Amazon: A choice modeling experiment

被引:37
|
作者
Casey, James F. [1 ]
Kahn, James R. [1 ]
Rivas, Alexandre A. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington & Lee Univ, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
关键词
Amazon River; Choice experiments; Non-use value; Ecosystem services;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper looks at the question of whether subsistence level/indigenous people place a value on the preservation of ecosystems independent of direct impacts of environmental change, such as impacts on their production activities. The economics literature generally suggests that non-use values don't exist among the poor and in the informal sector of the economy. We examine this issue through a choice modeling experiment. A survey was conducted of rainforest communities who live on the banks of the Amazon River (Rio Solimoes), in the vicinity of proposed oil and gas pipelines. The data were analyzed in the choice modeling framework, revealing relatively high amounts of compensation that were necessary in order to accept the potential ecosystem damages associated with oil transport, even if the people were completely compensated for direct damages such as loss of access to productive resources. These results suggest that environmental quality is important for its own sake, a result that is very different from the implicit assumption among many economists. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 559
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Willingness to Accept versus Willingness to Pay in a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Grutters, Janneke P. C.
    Kessels, Alfons G. H.
    Dirksen, Carmen D.
    van Helvoort-Postulart, Debby
    Anteunis, Lucien J. C.
    Joore, Manuela A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (07) : 1110 - 1119
  • [2] A choice experiment on the willingness of households to accept power outages
    Abrate, Graziano
    Bruno, Clementina
    Erbetta, Fabrizio
    Fraquelli, Giovanni
    Lorite-Espejo, Azahara
    [J]. UTILITIES POLICY, 2016, 43 : 151 - 164
  • [3] Willingness-To-Accept Pharmaceutical Retail Inconvenience: Evidence from a Contingent Choice Experiment
    Finlay, Keith
    Stoecker, Charles
    Cunningham, Scott
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [4] Assessing Farmers' Willingness to Accept "Greening": Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany
    Schulz, Norbert
    Breustedt, Gunnar
    Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 65 (01) : 26 - 48
  • [5] Landowner attitudes and willingness to accept compensation from forest carbon offsets: Application of best-worst choice modeling in Florida USA
    Soto, Jose R.
    Adams, Damian C.
    Escobedo, Francisco J.
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 63 : 35 - 42
  • [6] Farmers' Willingness to Accept Animal Welfare Practices: A Discrete Choice Experiment with German Pig Producers
    Danne, Michael
    Musshoff, Oliver
    [J]. GERMAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 71 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [7] Eliciting Herders' Willingness to Accept Grassland Conservation: A Choice Experiment Design in Pastoral Regions of China
    Lv, Xinxin
    Zhang, Mingxue
    Li, Dongqing
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [8] Bringing the neighbors in: A choice experiment on the influence of coordination and social norms on farmers' willingness to accept agro-environmental schemes across Europe
    Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio
    Sagebiel, Julian
    Olschewski, Roland
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 84 : 200 - 215
  • [9] Testing for non-linear willingness to accept compensation for controlled electricity switch-offs using choice experiments
    Ladenburg, Jacob
    Jensen, Kirsten Lund
    Lodahl, Christa
    Keles, Dogan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 238
  • [10] Balancing benefits and risks: Assessing willingness to accept compensation for clean energy facility siting in China-An examination of knowledge, attitudes, and practices
    Ye, Yong
    Gao, Sinan
    Zhang, Xiaojun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023,