A Nonlinear Approach to Dimension Reduction

被引:5
|
作者
Gottlieb, Lee-Ad [1 ]
Krauthgamer, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Ariel Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Math, Ariel, Israel
[2] Weizmann Inst Sci, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Nonlinear embedding; Snowflake embedding; Doubling dimension; Dimension reduction; METRIC-SPACES; EMBEDDING SUBSPACES; LP;
D O I
10.1007/s00454-015-9707-9
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The l(2) flattening lemma of Johnson and Lindenstrauss (in: Proceedings of the conference in modern analysis and probability, 1984) is a powerful tool for dimension reduction. It has been conjectured that the target dimension bounds can be refined and bounded in terms of the intrinsic dimensionality of the dataset (for example, the doubling dimension). One such problem was proposed by Lang and Plaut (Geom Dedicata 87(1-3):285-307, 2001) (see also Abraham et al. in: Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, 2008; Chan et al. in: J ACM 57(4):1-26, 2010; Gupta et al. in: Proceedings of the 44th annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science, 2003; Matousek in: Open problems on low-distortion embeddings of finite metric spaces, 2002), and is still open. We prove another result in this line of work: The snowflake metric d(alpha) (alpha < 1) of a doubling set S subset of l(2) embeds with constant distortion into l(2)(D) for dimension D that depends solely on the doubling constant of the metric. In fact, the distortion can be made arbitrarily close to 1, and the target dimension is polylogarithmic in the doubling constant. Our techniques are robust and extend to the more difficult space l(1), although the dimension bounds here are quantitatively inferior to those for l(2).
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 315
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Nonlinear Approach to Dimension Reduction
    Gottlieb, Lee-Ad
    Krauthgamer, Robert
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, 2011, : 888 - 899
  • [2] A Nonlinear Approach to Dimension Reduction
    Lee-Ad Gottlieb
    Robert Krauthgamer
    [J]. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 2015, 54 : 291 - 315
  • [3] An Extended Isomap Approach for Nonlinear Dimension Reduction
    Yousaf M.
    Rehman T.U.
    Jing L.
    [J]. SN Computer Science, 2020, 1 (3)
  • [4] Robust nonlinear dimension reduction: A self-organizing approach
    Hou, YX
    Yao, LY
    He, PL
    [J]. FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3614 : 67 - 72
  • [5] Nonlinear dimension reduction of FMRI data: The Laplacian embedding approach
    Thirion, B
    Faugeras, O
    [J]. 2004 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: MACRO TO NANO, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 372 - 375
  • [6] Discrete approach to stochastic parametrization and dimension reduction in nonlinear dynamics
    Chorin, Alexandre J.
    Lu, Fei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (32) : 9804 - 9809
  • [7] Variational Dimension Reduction in Nonlinear Elasticity: A Young Measure Approach
    Freddi, Lorenzo
    Paroni, Roberto
    [J]. IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON RELATIONS OF SHELL, PLATE, BEAM, AND 3D MODELS, 2008, 9 : 111 - +
  • [8] A Multi-step Nonlinear Dimension-reduction Approach with Applications to Bigdata
    Krishnan, R.
    Samaranayake, V. A.
    Jagannathan, S.
    [J]. INNS CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND DEEP LEARNING, 2018, 144 : 81 - 88
  • [9] Nonlinear MDOF system stochastic response determination via a dimension reduction approach
    Kougioumtzoglou, Ioannis A.
    Spanos, Pol D.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2013, 126 : 135 - 148
  • [10] Reduction of dimension for nonlinear dynamical systems
    Heather A. Harrington
    Robert A. Van Gorder
    [J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 88 : 715 - 734