In vivo antibacterial effects of simulated human serum profiles of once-daily versus thrice-daily dosing of amikacin in a Serratia marcescens endocarditis experimental model

Once-daily dosage of aminoglycosides is currently under consideration. The lower toxicity of this regimen has been clearly established, but there are conflicting experimental and clinical data concerning its efficacy. It is inadvisable to optimize human therapy by extrapolation from experimental studies since animal and human pharmacokinetics differ. The simulation of human pharmacokinetics in experimental infectious models would seem to offer a more rational approach. We used computer-controlled infusion of amikacin at a variable flow rate to simulate human pharmacokinetics in a Serratia marcescens rabbit endocarditis model and to compare two therapeutic regimens (once-daily versus thrice-daily doses). The doses corresponded to simulations of 15 and 30 mg/kg of body weight per day in humans, and antibacterial activity was measured in vegetations (Veg) after 24 h of treatment. The results show that the dose corresponding to 15 mg/kg/day failed to produce a significant reduction of CFU (6.8 +/- 0.9 and 6.4 +/- 0.8 log(10) CFU/g of Veg, respectively, for once-daily and thrice-daily doses versus 7.6 +/- 1.0 for controls). A significant reduction was observed only for the dose corresponding to 30 mg/kg/day in humans (5.2 +/- 1.5 and 5.4 +/- 1.1 log(10) CFU/g of Veg, respectively, for the two regimens). With this model, the efficacy of amikacin was similar for both regimens after 24 h of treatment simulating human pharmacokinetics.