Reaction of sugar beet S1 lines and cultivars to different isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina and Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2IIIB

被引:6
|
作者
Mahmoudi, Seyed Bagher [1 ]
Ghashghaie, Sara [2 ]
机构
[1] Sugar Beet Seed Inst, Karaj, Alborz Iran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Charcoal rot; Drought; Rhizoctoniasolani; Sugar beet; POPULATION-GENETICS; RESISTANCE; FUNGAL; PATHOGENICITY; PATHOGENESIS; GREENHOUSE; VULGARIS; MEXICAN;
D O I
10.1007/s10681-012-0832-8
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Interactions of 17 sugar beet lines and cultivars with four isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina (the causal agent of charcoal rot) and one isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (the causal agent of crown and root rot) were studied in separate experiments under greenhouse conditions. The isolates of Macrophomina were taken from their host plants, sugar beet (two isolates), soybean and sesame. In the first experiment, the colonized toothpick was used as inoculum. In the second experiment, six-month-old sugar beet plants were inoculated with barley seeds colonized with M. phaseolina. For the inoculation of sugar beet lines with R. solani, the colonized corn seeds were used. Root symptoms were recorded four weeks after inoculation, by estimating the proportion of the root surface infected by the pathogens, using a 1-9 standard scale. Our results showed a significant difference among lines and cultivars in their resistance to these two pathogens. Line B8618 was found to be considerably resistant to the isolates of the both pathogens. The inoculation methods of Macrophomina isolates had no significant effect on the results. The interaction between isolate and cultivar was not also significant in Macrophomina-resistant lines. Therefore, it appears that the response of sugar beet lines to the tested fungal isolates was not differential. These resistant lines showed a high resistance to all the tested M. phaseolina isolates. Our results revealed that the Macrophomina-resistant lines also showed resistance to R. solani. Furthermore, the sugar beet drought tolerant lines (M293, M362 and M345) were susceptible to the tested M. phaseolina and R. solani isolates.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 445
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reaction of sugar beet S1 lines and cultivars to different isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina and Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2IIIB
    Seyed Bagher Mahmoudi
    Sara Ghashghaie
    Euphytica, 2013, 190 : 439 - 445
  • [2] First Report of Sugar Beet Rhizoctonia Crown and Root Rot Caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2IIIB in Shanxi Province of China
    Zhao, C.
    Wu, X. H.
    PLANT DISEASE, 2014, 98 (03) : 419 - 420
  • [3] Comparison of crown and root inoculation method for evaluating the reaction of sugar beet cultivars to Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 IIIB
    Bhuiyan, M. Z. R.
    Lakshman, Dilip K.
    Mendoza, Luis E. Del Rio
    Qi, Aiming
    Khan, M. F. R.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2023, 163
  • [4] First report of Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2-IIIB on sugar beet in Turkey
    Meltem Avan
    Gülsüm Palacıoğlu
    Yakup Zekai Katırcıoğlu
    Rıza Kaya
    Harun Bayraktar
    Salih Maden
    Journal of Plant Pathology, 2021, 103 : 377 - 377
  • [5] First report of Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2-IIIB on sugar beet in Turkey
    Avan, Meltem
    Palacioglu, Gulsum
    Katircioglu, Yakup Zekai
    Kaya, Riza
    Bayraktar, Harun
    Maden, Salih
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2021, 103 (01) : 377 - 377
  • [6] Interaction of Sugar Beet Host Resistance and Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2 IIIB Strains
    Strausbaugh, Carl A.
    Eujayl, Imad A.
    Panella, Leonard W.
    PLANT DISEASE, 2013, 97 (09) : 1175 - 1180
  • [7] Susceptibility of sugar beet and beans to Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2 IIIB and AG-2-2 IV
    Engelkes, CA
    Windels, CE
    PLANT DISEASE, 1996, 80 (12) : 1413 - 1417
  • [8] Efficacy of different inoculum forms of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2IIIB for resistance screening of sugar beet varieties
    Bhuiyan, M. Z. R.
    Mendoza, Luis E. del Rio
    Lakshman, Dilip K.
    Qi, Aiming
    Khan, M. F. R.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2023, 105 (04) : 1551 - 1561
  • [9] Efficacy of different inoculum forms of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2IIIB for resistance screening of sugar beet varieties
    M. Z. R. Bhuiyan
    Luis E. del Río Mendoza
    Dilip K. Lakshman
    Aiming Qi
    M. F. R. Khan
    Journal of Plant Pathology, 2023, 105 (4) : 1551 - 1561
  • [10] Aggressiveness of Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-2 ISGs IV and IIIB on sugar beet and rotation crops
    Brantner, J. R.
    Windels, C. E.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (06) : S19 - S19