Does Apico-Coronal Implant Position Influence Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss? A 36-Month Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:12
|
作者
Pellicer-Chover, Hilario [1 ]
Penarrocha-Diago, Maria [2 ]
Aloy-Prosper, Amparo [3 ]
Canullo, Luigi [4 ]
Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel [1 ,3 ]
Penarrocha-Oltra, David [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Oral Surg & Implant Dent,Oral Surg Unit, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Oral Surg,Oral Surg Unit, Valencia, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Oral Surg, Valencia, Spain
[4] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Oral Surg & Implantol, Valencia, Spain
[5] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Oral Surg Unit, Valencia, Spain
关键词
PLACEMENT DEPTH; SOFT-TISSUE; NONSUBMERGED IMPLANTS; CONNECTION IMPLANTS; MICROGAP LOCATION; CRESTAL; ABUTMENT; PARAMETERS; CONFIGURATION; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2018.11.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Preserving peri-implant bone and reducing exposure of the rough implant surface might influence long-term outcomes of implant therapy. The aim of this study was to compare peri-implant clinical and radiologic parameters after crestal and subcrestal dental implant placement at 36 month's follow-up. Materials and Methods: We carried out a randomized clinical trial involving partially edentulous patients in need of an implant-supported, partial fixed dental prosthesis or a single crown. Patients were randomized according to the implant insertion depth: implants placed approximately 2 mm below the bone crest (test group) or implants placed at bone crest level (control group). They were evaluated 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after prosthetic loading. Peri-implant marginal bone loss was the primary outcome, and the following secondary outcomes were registered: coronal bone changes, plaque index, probing depth, modified bleeding index, retraction and width of the peri-implant mucosa, and peri-implant health condition. Implant survival and success rates after 36 month's follow-up were calculated. Results: The study comprised 128 patients (83 men and 45 women; mean age, 54.4 +/- 12.2 years) and a total of 265 implants (133 in control group and 132 in test group). No statistically significant differences in the peri-implant clinical parameters were found. After 3 year's follow-up, 53.4% of the crestal implants and 25.8% of the subcrestal implants presented marginal bone loss, with a mean exposed rough surface of -0.2 +/- 0.3 mm and -0.09 +/- 0.1 mm, respectively (P = .001). The overall success rate was 99.6%. Conclusions: Crestal and subcrestal implants showed similar clinical outcomes 3 years after prosthetic loading. Significant differences were observed in the radiologic parameters, showing less peri-implant marginal bone loss with subcrestal implants. (C) 2018 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 527
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of abutment disconnection on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial
    Praca, Luciano de Freitas Guimaraes
    Teixeira, Renata Cordeiro
    Rego, Rodrigo Otavio
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (04) : 341 - 351
  • [2] Clinical Peri-Implant Parameters and Marginal Bone Loss for Early Mandibular Implant Overdentures: A Follow-Up of 60 Months
    Alhelal, Abdulaziz A.
    Alzaid, Abdulaziz A.
    Almujel, Saad H.
    Alsaloum, Mohammed
    Alanazi, Khalid K.
    Althubaitiy, Ramzi O.
    Al-Aali, Khulud A.
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (04):
  • [3] A 36-month follow-up prospective cohort study on peri-implant bone loss of Morse Taper connection implants with platform switching
    Cassetta, Michele
    Di Mambro, Alfonso
    Giansanti, Matteo
    Brandetti, Giulia
    Calasso, Sabrina
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2016, 58 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [4] Influence of Implant-Prosthetic Connection on Peri-implant Bone Loss: A Prospective Clinical Trial with 2-Year Follow-up
    Agustin-Panadero, Ruben
    Leon-Martinez, Raquel
    Labaig-Rueda, Carlos
    Faus-Lopez, Joan
    Fernanda Sola-Ruiz, Ma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (04) : 963 - 968
  • [5] Influence of Apico-Coronal Implant Placement on Post-Surgical Crestal Bone Loss in Humans
    Ercoli, Carlo
    Jammal, Georges
    Buyers, Madeline
    Tsigarida, Alexandra Athanasiou
    Chochlidakis, Konstantinos Michail
    Feng, Changyong
    Caton, Jack
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 88 (08) : 762 - 770
  • [6] MicroRNAs in Peri-implant Crevicular Fluid Can Predict Peri-implant Bone Resorption: Clinical Trial with a 5-Year Follow-up
    Menini, Maria
    Pesce, Paolo
    Pera, Francesco
    Baldi, Domenico
    Pulliero, Alessandra
    Izzotti, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (06) : 1148 - 1157
  • [7] The influence of titanium base abutments on peri-implant soft tissue inflammatory parameters and marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial
    Pamato, Saulo
    Honorio, Heitor Marques
    da Costa, Jorge Alexandre
    Traebert, Jefferson Luiz
    Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
    Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (04) : 542 - 548
  • [8] Peri-implant marginal bone loss: an academic controversy or a clinical challenge?
    Klinge, Bjoern
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 5 : S13 - S19
  • [9] Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rates and crestal bone levels: a 36-month follow-up prospective study
    Malchiodi, Luciano
    Cucchi, Alessandro
    Ghensi, Paolo
    Consonni, Dario
    Nocini, Pier F.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (02) : 240 - 251
  • [10] Effect of vertical implant position on marginal bone loss: a randomized clinical trial
    Hedayatipanah, Morad
    Arasteh, Hadi Kokabi
    Shokri, Abbas
    Alafchi, Behnaz
    Baghdadi, Leila Shahsavand
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):