An evaluation of the potential of polarimetric radiometry for numerical weather prediction using QuikSCAT

被引:4
|
作者
English, SJ [1 ]
Candy, B
Jupp, A
Bebbington, D
Smith, S
Holt, A
机构
[1] UK Met Off, Exeter EX14 3HW, Devon, England
[2] Univ Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
来源
关键词
QuikSCAT assimilation; weather; WindSat;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2005.855998
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
It has been proposed that wind vector information derived from passive microwave radiometry. may provide an impact on numerical weather forecasts of similar magnitude to that achieved by scatterometers. Polarimetric radiometers have a lower sensitivity to wind direction than scatterometers at low wind speed but comparable sensitivity at high windspeed. In this paper, we describe an experiment which aimed to determine if an observing system only capable of providing wind direction information at wind speeds over 8 ms(-1) can provide comparable impact to one providing wind vectors at wind speeds over 2 ms(-1). The QuikSCAT dataset used in the experiments has a wide swath and is used operationally by several forecast centers. The results confirm that assimilation of wind vectors from QuikSCAT only for wind speeds above 8 ms(-1) gives similar analysis increments and forecast impacts to assimilating wind vectors at all wind speeds above 2 ms(-1). Measurements from the WindSat five frequency polarimetric radiometer are compared with calculations from Met Office global forecast fields, and this also confirms that WindSat measurement and radiative transfer model accuracy appears to be sufficiently good to provide useful information for numerical weather prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 675
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Quikscat data on numerical weather prediction
    Atlas, R
    Bloom, SC
    Ardizzone, J
    Brin, E
    Terry, J
    Yu, TW
    OCEAN REMOTE SENSING AND IMAGING II, 2003, 5155 : 211 - 215
  • [2] Evaluation of laser heterodyne radiometry for numerical weather prediction applications
    Smith, Fiona
    Havemann, Stephan
    Hoffmann, Alex
    Bell, William
    Weidmann, Damien
    Newman, Stuart
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 144 (715) : 1831 - 1850
  • [3] Polarimetric radar-based methods for evaluation of hydrometeor mixtures in numerical weather prediction models
    Pejcic, Velibor
    Simmer, Clemens
    Troemel, Silke
    2021 21ST INTERNATIONAL RADAR SYMPOSIUM (IRS), 2021,
  • [4] The Potential for Discriminating Microphysical Processes in Numerical Weather Forecasts Using Airborne Polarimetric Radio Occultations
    Murphy, Michael J., Jr.
    Haase, Jennifer S.
    Padulles, Ramon
    Chen, Shu-Hua
    Morris, Margaret A.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [5] Storm Cell Observation And Prediction Using Polarimetric Weather Radars
    Reinoso-Rondinel, Ricardo
    Evaristo, Raquel
    Schmidt, Mari
    Crijnen, Felix
    Troemel, Silke
    Simmer, Clemens
    2021 21ST INTERNATIONAL RADAR SYMPOSIUM (IRS), 2021,
  • [6] WindSat polarimetric microwave observations improve southern hemisphere numerical weather prediction
    Le Marshall, John
    Bi, Li
    Jung, James
    Zapotocny, Tom
    Morgan, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN METEOROLOGICAL MAGAZINE, 2007, 56 (01): : 35 - 40
  • [7] Evaluation of the Accuracy of Numerical Weather Prediction Models
    Saur, David
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PERSPECTIVES AND APPLICATIONS (CSOC2015), 2015, 347 : 181 - 191
  • [8] Using ensembles of numerical weather forecasts for road weather prediction
    Schultz, P
    18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIVE INFORMATION AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS (IIPS) FOR METEOROLOGY, OCEANOGRAPHY, AND HYDROLOGY, 2002, : 32 - 34
  • [9] Uncertainty Evaluation in a Flood Forecasting Model Using JMA Numerical Weather Prediction
    Kardhana, Hadi
    Mano, Akira
    JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESEARCH, 2009, 4 (04) : 600 - 605
  • [10] On the use of QuikSCAT scatterometer measurements of surface winds for marine weather prediction
    Chelton, Dudley B.
    Freilich, Michael H.
    Sienkiewicz, Joseph M.
    Von Ahn, Joan M.
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2006, 134 (08) : 2055 - 2071