Economic Analysis and Comparison of Electric and Conventional Heating Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Stief, Thomas [1 ]
Safari, Mahsa [2 ]
Johnson, Hugh [2 ]
Wen, Jin [3 ]
Gurian, Patrick L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Civil Engn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Drexel Inst Energy & Environm, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The electrification of buildings presents an opportunity to reduce building emissions of greenhouse gases while providing a more efficient alternative to conventional heating systems. Heat pump systems are a growing technology in the United States and are continuously being evaluated for energy savings potential as well as overall cost compared to conventional systems. This paper explores the comparison of a conventional boiler heating system to a variable flow refrigerant system with respect to capital cost, operational cost, and CO2 emissions. A reference multifamily building in the northeastern United States is used to provide a case study comparison of the systems. The use of a carbon pricing initiative is evaluated in order to create an economic incentive for electrification of buildings. It was found that a carbon tax of $160/ton CO2 would be required to equalize the life cycle costs of the two systems. The scenario of a clean 100% renewable electrical grid was also considered. In this case a carbon tax of $125/ton CO2 was found for the breakeven point, a reduction of 22% for the required price on carbon.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 295
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conventional and electric vehicles: a complete economic and environmental comparison
    Graditi, G.
    Langella, G.
    Laterza, C.
    Valenti, M.
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLEAN ELECTRICAL POWER (ICCEP), 2015, : 660 - 665
  • [2] Economic comparison between conventional aquaponics and FLOCponics systems
    Pinho, Sara M. M.
    Flores, Roberto Manolio Valladao H.
    David, Luiz H. K.
    Emerenciano, Mauricio G. C.
    Quagrainie, Kwamena K.
    Portella, Maria Celia
    AQUACULTURE, 2022, 552
  • [3] ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS BY SIMULATION
    RAMACHANDRAN, V
    KIMBLER, DL
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1987, 13 (1-4) : 134 - 137
  • [4] An economic comparison and evaluation of two geothermal district heating systems for advanced exergoeconomic analysis
    Kecebas, Pinar
    Gokgedik, Harun
    Alkan, Mehmet Ali
    Kecebas, Ali
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 84 : 471 - 480
  • [5] An Economic Comparison between Electric and Conventional Vehicles Based on System Dynamics
    Xu, Jianquan
    Yang, Yanping
    Yin, Renshu
    RESEARCH IN MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, PTS 1-3, 2014, 835-836 : 2003 - 2008
  • [6] Economic Analysis of Electric Heating Based on Critical Electricity Price
    Xie, Feng
    Sun, Zhijie
    Zhou, Xinnan
    Fu, Chengran
    Yang, Jie
    MATERIALS SCIENCE, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY AND POWER ENGINEERING II (MEP2018), 2018, 1971
  • [7] Economic and Energetic Assessment and Comparison of Solar Heating and Cooling Systems
    Delac, Boris
    Pavkovic, Branimir
    Glazar, Vladimir
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [8] Comparative study of conventional and solar heating systems under tunnel Tunisian greenhouses: Thermal performance and economic analysis
    Lazaar, Mariem
    Bouadila, Salwa
    Kooli, Sami
    Farhat, Abdelhamid
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2015, 120 : 620 - 635
  • [9] AN ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF GEOTHERMAL AND CONVENTIONAL ELECTRICAL ENERGY-SYSTEMS
    HORNING, RR
    THAYER, GR
    HARDIE, RW
    WILLIAMSON, KD
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1980, 34 (JUN): : 7 - 9
  • [10] Economic and environmental comparison of conventional, hybrid, electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles
    Granovskii, Mikhail
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2006, 159 (02) : 1186 - 1193