Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Martin-Fernandez, Elena [1 ]
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio [1 ]
deLlanos-Lanchares, Hector [1 ]
Andres Mauvezin-Quevedo, Mario [1 ]
Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza [2 ]
Alvarez-Arenal, Angel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont & Occlus, Oviedo, Spain
[2] Univ Basque Country, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Oral Stomatol 1, Leioa, Spain
关键词
DENTAL IMPLANTS; FUNCTIONAL DEFORMATION; EDENTULOUS SUBJECTS; BIOMECHANICS; SUPERSTRUCTURES; DISPLACEMENT; MOVEMENTS; 1-PIECE;
D O I
10.1155/2018/8241313
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of three mandibular full-arch superstructures on the peri-implant bone stress distribution during mandibular flexure caused by mid-opening (27 mm) and protrusion mandibular movements. Materials and Methods. Three-dimensional finite element models were created simulating six osseointegrated implants in the jawbone. One model simulated a 1-piece framework and the other simulated 2-piece and 3-piece frameworks. Muscle forces with definite direction and magnitude were exerted over areas of attachment to simulate multiple force vectors of masticatory muscles during mandibular protrusion and opening. Results. During the movement of 27.5 mm jaw opening, the 1-piece and 3-piece superstructures showed the lowest values of bone stress around the mesial implants, gradually increasing towards the distal position. During the protrusion movement, bone stress increased compared to opening for any implant situation and for a divided or undivided framework. The 3-piece framework showed the highest values of peri-implant bone stress, regardless of the implant situation. Conclusions. The undivided framework provides the best biomechanical environment during mandibular protrusion and opening. Protrusion movement increases the peri-implant bone stress. The most mesial implants have the lowest biomechanical risk.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mandibular Flexure and Crestal Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: Finite Element Analysis in Three Dimensions
    Sharma, Suraj
    Jain, Shashikala
    Gupta, Himanshu
    Gavara, Sai Govind
    Panwar, Pratibha
    Grover, Ramanjeet Kaur
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [2] Effect of Framework in an Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis
    Menini, Maria
    Pesce, Paolo
    Bevilacqua, Marco
    Pera, Francesco
    Tealdo, Tiziano
    Barberis, Fabrizio
    Pera, Paolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2015, 28 (06) : 627 - 630
  • [3] Stress evaluation of different implant lengths on atrophic edentulous mandibles with fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis
    Benevides, Fernanda
    Cimoes, Renata
    Vajgel, Andre
    Wilmersdorf, Ramiro Brito
    Farias Vajgel, Bruna de Carvalho
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 24 (04) : 358 - 374
  • [4] Non-linear 3D finite element analysis of full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures
    Ferreira, Mayara B.
    Barao, Valentim A.
    Delben, Juliana A.
    Faverani, Leonardo P.
    Hipolito, Ana Carolina
    Assuncao, Wirley G.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2014, 38 : 306 - 314
  • [5] Mechanical Response of PEKK and PEEK As Frameworks for Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis
    Villefort, Regina Furbino
    Diamantino, Pedro Jacy Santos
    von Zeidler, Sandra Lucia Ventorin
    Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto
    Silva-Concilio, Lais Regiane
    Saavedra, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni
    Tribst, Joao Paulo Mendes
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 16 (01) : 115 - 121
  • [6] Rationale for a fixed implant-supported transitional prosthesis in full-arch implant restorations
    Leclercq, P.
    Dohan, D. M.
    REVUE DE STOMATOLOGIE DE CHIRURGIE MAXILLO-FACIALE ET DE CHIRURGIE ORALE, 2007, 108 (06) : 530 - 535
  • [7] A Prosthesis Retention System for Full-Arch, Fixed, Implant-Supported Prosthesis
    Massad, Joseph
    Wicks, Russell
    Ahuja, Swati
    Cagna, David R.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (04): : E912 - E916
  • [8] Assessment of the efficacy of posterior extra-short implant support for an interforaminal implant-supported fixed full-arch mandibular prosthesis
    Tukel, H. Can
    Kucukkurt, S.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2020, 12 (02) : 181 - 188
  • [9] Stress Distribution in Bone and Implants in Mandibular 6-Implant-Supported Cantilevered Fixed Prosthesis: A 3D Finite Element Study
    Padhye, Omkar Vinayak
    Herekar, Manisha
    Patil, Viraj
    Mulani, Shahnawaz
    Sethi, Megha
    Fernandes, Aquaviva
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (06) : 680 - 685
  • [10] Factors affecting peri-implant bone resorption in four Implant supported mandibular full-arch restorations: a 3-year prospective study
    Krennmair, Stefan
    Weinlaender, Michael
    Forstner, Thomas
    Krennmair, Gerald
    Stimmelmayr, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 43 (01) : 92 - 101