Is magnetic resonance imaging becoming the new computed tomography for cervical spine clearance? Trends in magnetic resonance imaging utilization at a Level I trauma center

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Raymond [1 ]
Ryu, Robert C. [2 ]
Kim, Terrence T. [2 ]
Alban, Rodrigo F. [1 ]
Margulies, Daniel R. [1 ]
Ley, Eric J. [1 ]
Barmparas, Galinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg & Surg Crit Care, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
来源
关键词
Cervical spine clearance; blunt trauma; MRI; neurologic deficit; overutilization; BLUNT TRAUMA; INJURY; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; PATIENT; SCAN; RULE;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000002752
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Increasing evidence supports the limited use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cervical spine (C-spine) clearance following blunt trauma. We sought to characterize the utilization of MRI of the C-spine at a Level I trauma center. METHODS All blunt trauma patients undergoing a computed tomography (CT) of the C-spine between January 2009 and December 2018 were reviewed. The CT and MRI results, demographics, clinical presentation, subspecialty consultations, and interventions were recorded. The MRI results were considered clinically significant if they resulted in cervical thoracic orthosis/halo placement or surgical intervention. Linear regression models were utilized to identify trends. RESULTS There were 9,101 patients that underwent a CT of the C-spine, with 513 (5.6%) being positive for an acute injury. MRI was obtained for 375 (4.1%) of patients. A linear increase in the proportion of patients undergoing an MRI was noted, from 0.9% in 2009 to 5.6% in 2018 (p < 0.01). Of the 513 patients with a positive CT, 290 (56.5%) had an MRI. In 40 (13.8%) of them, the CT demonstrated a minor injury. Clinically significant MRI findings were noted only in two (5.0%) of the 40 patients, and both had a neurologic deficit on initial examination. Of the 8,588 patients with a negative CT, 85 (1.0%) underwent an MRI. Of those, 9 (10.6%) had a clinically significant MRI with all but one presenting with a neurological deficit. CONCLUSION MRI is increasingly utilized for C-spine clearance following blunt trauma. MRI was exceedingly unlikely to demonstrate a clinically significant finding in the absence of a neurological deficit, when the CT was negative or included minor injuries. Trauma centers are encouraged to constantly evaluate their own practices and intervene with education and collaboration to limit the excessive use of unnecessary resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management Study, Level III or IV. Diagnostic test, level IV.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 370
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography utilization trends in an academic ED
    Quaday, Karen A.
    Salzman, Joshua G.
    Gordon, Bradley D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 32 (06): : 524 - 528
  • [2] Variability in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spine injuries
    Holmes, JF
    Mirvis, SE
    Panacek, EA
    Hoffman, JR
    Mower, WR
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 53 (03): : 524 - 529
  • [3] Is Cervical Spine CT Sufficient in Pediatric Blunt Trauma? an Analysis of Cervical Spine Pathology Discovered on Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Normal Computed Tomography Scan in a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center
    Bullard, Kori L.
    Stephenson, Krista J.
    Wyrick, Deidre
    Maxson, Robert T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (05) : E220 - E220
  • [4] The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric cervical spine clearance
    Frank, JB
    Lim, CK
    Flynn, JM
    Dormans, JP
    SPINE, 2002, 27 (11) : 1176 - 1179
  • [5] Magnetic resonance imaging in combination with helical computed tomography provides a safe and efficient method of cervical spine clearance in the obtunded trauma patient
    Stassen, NA
    Williams, VA
    Gestring, ML
    Cheng, JD
    Bankey, PE
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 60 (01): : 171 - 175
  • [6] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN CERVICAL-SPINE TRAUMA
    HALL, AJ
    WAGLE, VG
    RAYCROFT, J
    GOLDMAN, RL
    BUTLER, AR
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1993, 34 (01): : 21 - 26
  • [7] Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging in blunt cervical trauma patients
    Malhotra, Ajay
    Wu, Xiao
    Mahalingam, Sowmya
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2017, 83 (04): : 748 - 749
  • [8] Computed tomography vs. magnetic resonance imaging in unstable cervical spine injuries
    Kodik, Meltem Songur
    Eraslan, Cenk
    Kitis, Omer
    Altunci, Yusuf Ali
    Biceroglu, Huseyin
    Akay, Ali
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2020, 26 (03): : 431 - 438
  • [9] Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography in Predicting Facet Arthrosis in the Cervical Spine
    Lehman, Ronald A., Jr.
    Helgeson, Melvin D.
    Keeler, Kathryn A.
    Bunmaprasert, Torphong
    Riew, K Daniel
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (01) : 65 - 68
  • [10] Single Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Planning in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy
    Beriwal, S.
    Kim, H.
    Coon, D.
    Mogus, R.
    Heron, D. E.
    Li, X.
    Huq, M. S.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 21 (06) : 483 - 487