Comparison of the bioMerieux NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0-HIV-1 RNA quantification assay versus Abbott RealTime HIV-1 and Roche Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 v2.0 on current epidemic HIV-1 variants

被引:18
|
作者
Mourez, Thomas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Delaugerre, Constance [4 ,5 ]
Vray, Muriel [6 ]
Lemee, Veronique [3 ]
Simon, Francois [4 ,5 ]
Plantier, Jean-Christophe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Normandie Univ, Caen, France
[2] Univ Rouen, IRIB, Equipe Accueil 2656, F-76183 Rouen, France
[3] CHU Rouen, Lab Virol, Associe Ctr Natl Reference VIH, F-76031 Rouen, France
[4] Univ Paris 07, F-75010 Paris, France
[5] Hop St Louis, AP HP, Lab Virol, F-75010 Paris, France
[6] Inst Pasteur, Unite Epidemiol Malad Emergentes, F-75014 Paris, France
关键词
HIV-1; Quantification; Genetic diversity; HIV-O; Viral load; IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS TYPE-1; GROUP-O; AMPLICOR; DISCREPANCIES; DIVERSITY; SUBTYPES; VERSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2015.08.007
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: An improved version of the bioMerieux NucliSENS (R) EasyQ (R) HIV-1 v2.0 has been introduced to overcome the underquantification observed with previous versions, especially with non-B HIV-1 subtypes. Objectives: Comparing bioMerieux NucliSENS (R) EasyQ (R) HIV-1 v2.0 versus Roche Cobas CA/CTM v2.0 and Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assays for HIV-1 group M and non-M (N, O, P) viral load measurement. Study design: The three assays were tested in parallel on 103HIV-1 group M plasma samples, and on non-group M HIV-1 culture supernatants. Results: Values obtained for the 103HIV-1 group M plasma samples tested with bioMerieux assay showed good overall correlation compared to the 2 others. The Roche Cobas assay gave higher values than the bioMerieux assay, while Abbott and bioMerieux both displayed similar results. However, analysis showed a wider dispersion in results when comparing the bioMerieux NucliSENS (R) EasyQ (R) HIV-1 v2.0 and the other 2 techniques. All data taken into account, we observed frequent discrepancies in quantification, of the plasma samples and major differences above 1 log in 10/72 (13.8%). The quantification of non-M HIV groups in culture supernatant has shown variable results, with better quantification of HIV-O and of HIV-N respectively with the Abbott assay and the bioMerieux assay. Conclusions: The bioMerieux NucliSENS (R) EasyQ (R) HIV-1 v2.0 showed improved sensitivity to non-B HIV-M subtypes compared to previous versions. Notwithstanding, we observed frequent discrepancies and a wide dispersion in results when comparing bioMerieux NucliSENS (R) EasyQ (R) HIV-1 v2.0 and the other 2 techniques. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 81
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HIV-1 RNA quantification in plasma specimens using nuclisens easyQ HIV-1 V2.0
    Oosterlaken, T.
    van Deursen, P.
    Jurriaans, S.
    Ligeon, V.
    Bertens, L.
    de Jong, J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2009, 46 : S27 - S27
  • [2] Evaluation of the RealTime HIV-1, Xpert HIV-1, and Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assays in Comparison to the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0 Assay for Quantification of HIV-1 Viral Load
    Mor, Orna
    Gozlan, Yael
    Wax, Marina
    Mileguir, Fernando
    Rakovsky, Avia
    Noy, Bina
    Mendelson, Ella
    Levy, Itzchak
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (11) : 3458 - 3465
  • [3] Comparison of the NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0 with Abbott m2000rt RealTime HIV-1 assay for plasma RNA quantitation in different HIV-1 subtypes
    Gomes, Perpetua
    Carvalho, Ana Patricia
    Diogo, Isabel
    Goncalves, Fatima
    Costa, Ines
    Cabanas, Joaquim
    Camacho, Ricardo Jorge
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 193 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [4] Comparison of the Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay to the Roche COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test v2.0 for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma samples
    Schonning, Kristian
    Johansen, Kim
    Landt, Bodil
    Benfield, Thomas
    Westh, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2017, 92 : 14 - 19
  • [5] COMPARISON OF THE APTIMA HIV-1 QUANT ASSAY TO THE COBAS AMPLIPREP/COBAS TAQMAN HIV-1 TEST, V2.0
    Hatzakis, A.
    Papachristou, H.
    Kantzanou, M.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2013, 89 : A353 - A353
  • [6] Comparison of Abbott RealTime HIV-1 and Roche COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HIV-1 Assays
    Abravaya, K.
    Hackett, J.
    Swanson, P.
    Huang, S.
    Tang, N.
    Robinson, J.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2008, 10 (06): : 587 - 587
  • [7] Comparison of the Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test v1.0 with v2.0 in HIV-1 viral load quantification
    Tung, Yi-Ching
    Ke, Liang-Yin
    Lu, Po-Liang
    Lin, Kuei-Hsiang
    Lee, Su-Chen
    Lin, Yi-Ying
    Chou, Li-Chiu
    Tsai, Wen-Chan
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 31 (04): : 188 - 193
  • [8] Comparative evaluation of the Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay and COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 v2.0 assay using the Roche High Pure System for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma
    Schalasta, Gunnar
    Boerner, Anna
    Speicher, Andrea
    Enders, Martin
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 54 (03) : 493 - 499
  • [9] Comparison of the Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay to the Roche COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test v2.0 for the quantification of HIV-RNA in plasma samples
    Schonning, K.
    Johansen, K.
    Landt, B.
    Benfield, T.
    Westh, H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2016, 82 : S53 - S53
  • [10] Comparative RNA Quantification of HIV-1 Group M and Non-M With the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 v2.0 and Abbott Real-Time HIV-1 PCR Assays
    Sire, Jean-Marie
    Vray, Muriel
    Merzouk, Mourad
    Plantier, Jean-Christophe
    Pavie, Juliette
    Maylin, Sarah
    Timsit, Julie
    Lascoux-Combe, Caroline
    Molina, Jean-Michel
    Simon, Francois
    Delaugerre, Constance
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2011, 56 (03) : 239 - 243