Suggestion for the omission of post-mastectomy chest wall radiation therapy in patients who underwent skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Nalee [1 ]
Park, Won [1 ,4 ]
Cho, Won Kyung [1 ]
Kim, Hae Young [1 ]
Choi, Doo Ho [1 ]
Nam, Seok Jin [2 ]
Kim, Seok Won [2 ]
Lee, Jeong Eon [2 ]
Yu, Jonghan [2 ]
Chae, Byung Joo [2 ]
Lee, Se Kyung [2 ]
Ryu, Jai Min [2 ]
Mun, Goo-Hyun [3 ]
Pyon, Jai-Kyong [3 ]
Jeon, Byung-Joon [3 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Breast Surg,Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, 81 Irwon ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
来源
BREAST | 2022年 / 66卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Mastectomy; Skin -sparing mastectomy; Nipple -sparing mastectomy; Radiation therapy; Local recurrence; BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS; POSITIVE LYMPH-NODES; LOCOREGIONAL RECURRENCE; LOCAL RECURRENCE; RISK-FACTORS; MULTICENTER ANALYSIS; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; RADIOTHERAPY; RECONSTRUCTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2022.09.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: Both skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have been widely adopted. Although postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) can improve clinical outcomes, it can worsen cosmesis following reconstruction. Therefore, identifying risk factors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) could help de-escalate PMRT after NSM/SSM in patients with pT1-2 disease.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with SSM (N = 400) and NSM (N = 156) in patients with pT1-2N0-1 disease between 2009 and 2016. Seventy-four patients received PMRT with 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the prognostic factors of IBTR.Results: With a median follow-up of 66.2 months, 17 IBTR events were observed, with 5-year IBTR-free rate of 97.2%. Although only one IBTR was observed after PMRT, there was no statistical difference in the 5-year IBTR-free rate (PMRT vs. no PMRT, 98.6% vs. 97.0%, p = 0.360). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that age <= 45 years and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were adverse features of IBTR. The low-risk group (0 risk factor) showed a better 5-year IBTR-free rate than the high-risk group (>= 1 risk factor) (100.0% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.003). In the high-risk group, PMRT slightly improved 5-year IBTR-free rate compared with no PMRT (98.6% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.166). In addition, PMRT increased 5-year cumulative incidence of reconstruction failure (10.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.001).Conclusion: We identified risk factors (age and LVI) related to IBTR following upfront SSM/NSM with pT1-2 disease. As a hypothesis-generating study, de-escalation of PMRT by omitting chest wall irradiation in selec-tive patients could improve reconstruction-related complications without compromising oncologic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 61
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IS THE SENSITIVITY OF SKIN-SPARING MASTECTOMY OR NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY SUPERIOR TO CONVENTIONAL MASTECTOMY WITH INNERVATED FLAP?
    Mori, Hiroki
    Okazaki, Mutsumi
    MICROSURGERY, 2011, 31 (06) : 428 - 433
  • [2] Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy - goals, pitfalls, contraindications
    Galimberti, V.
    BREAST, 2017, 32 : S14 - S14
  • [3] Risk Factors for Complications after Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Paprottka, Felix J.
    Schlett, Christopher L.
    Luketina, Rosalia
    Paprottka, Karolin
    Klimas, Dalius
    Radtke, Christine
    Hebebrand, Detlev
    BREAST CARE, 2019, 14 (05) : 289 - 296
  • [4] Skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations
    Chagpar, AB
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2004, 70 (05) : 425 - 432
  • [5] Multidisciplinary international survey of post-operative radiation therapy practices after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy
    Marta, Gustavo Nader
    Poortmans, Philip
    de Barros, Alfredo C.
    Filassi, Jose Roberto
    Freitas Junior, Ruffo
    Audisio, Riccardo A.
    Mano, Max Senna
    Meterissian, Sarkis
    DeSnyder, Sarah M.
    Buchholz, Thomas A.
    Hijal, Tarek
    EJSO, 2017, 43 (11): : 2036 - 2043
  • [6] Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy
    Agha, R. A.
    Al Omran, Y.
    Wellstead, G.
    Sagoo, H.
    Barai, I
    Rajmohan, S.
    Borrelli, M. R.
    Vella-Baldacchino, M.
    Orgill, D. P.
    Rusby, J. E.
    BJS OPEN, 2019, 3 (02): : 135 - 145
  • [7] Patterns of recurrence in breast cancer patients after nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy
    Alvarado, L.
    Mahmoud, D.
    Franco, R.
    Poortmans, P.
    Kaidar-Person, O.
    Hijal, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S171 - S172
  • [8] Post-operative Irradiation after Nipple-Sparing or Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: An International Survey
    Marta, G. N.
    Poortmans, P.
    Audisio, R. A.
    Freitas Junior, R.
    De Barros, A. C.
    Filassi, J. R.
    DeSnyder, S. M.
    Meterissian, S.
    Buchholz, T. A.
    Hijal, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S642 - S642
  • [9] Nipple-Sparing, Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: An 11-Year Retrospective Study
    Corbitt, John, Jr.
    Anthony, Lori
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : S167 - S167
  • [10] Oncologic Safety of Skin-Sparing and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Discussion and Review of the Literature
    Tokin, Christopher
    Weiss, Anna
    Wang-Rodriguez, Jessica
    Blair, Sarah L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 2012