Endoscopic Therapy for Bleeding Ulcers: An Evidence-Based Approach Based on Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:224
|
作者
Laine, Loren [1 ]
McQuaid, Kenneth R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Div Gastrointestinal & Liver Dis, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR; HEATER PROBE THERMOCOAGULATION; NONBLEEDING VISIBLE VESSEL; HYPERTONIC SALINE-EPINEPHRINE; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATION; DUODENAL PEPTIC-ULCER; INJECTION THERAPY; MULTIPOLAR ELECTROCOAGULATION; INTRAVENOUS OMEPRAZOLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.016
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine appropriate endoscopic treatment of patients with bleeding ulcers by synthesizing results of randomized controlled trials. We performed dual independent bibliographic database searches to identify, randomized trials of thermal therapy, injection therapy, or clips for bleeding ulcers with active bleeding, visible vessels, or clots, focusing on results from studies without second-look endoscopy and re-treatment. The primary end point was further (persistent plus recurrent) bleeding. Compared with epinephrine, further bleeding was reduced significantly by other monotherapies (relative risk [RR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36-0.93]; number-needed-to-treat [NNT], 9 [95% CI, 5-53]), and epinephrine followed by another modality (RR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.23-0.501; NNT, 5 [95% CI, 5-7]); epinephrine was not significantly less effective in studies with second-look and re-treatment. Compared with no endoscopic therapy, further bleeding was reduced by thermal contact (heater probe, bipolar electrocoagulation) (RP, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.36-0.54]; NNT, 4 [95% CI, 3-5]) and sclerosant therapy (RR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.38 - 0.831; NNT, 5 [95% CI, 4-131). Clips were more effective than epinephrine (RR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.09-0.551; NNT, 5 [95% CI, 4-9]), but not different than other therapies, although the latter studies were heterogeneous, showing better and worse results for clips. Endoscopic therapy was effective for active bleeding (RR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.20 - 0.43]; NNT, 2 [95% CI, 2-21) and a nonbleeding visible vessel (RR, 0.49; [95% CI, 0.40-0.591; NNT, 5 [95% Cl, 4 - 61), but not for a clot. Bolus followed by continuous-infusion proton pump inhibitor after endoscopic therapy significantly improved outcome compared with placebo/no therapy (RR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.28-0.59]; NNT, 12 [95% CI, 10-18]), but not compared with histamine(2)-receptor antagonists. Thermal devices, sclerosants, clips, and thrombin/fibrin glue appear to be effective endoscopic hemostatic therapies. Epinephrine should not be used alone. Endoscopic therapy should be performed for ulcers with active bleeding and nonbleeding visible vessels, but efficacy is uncertain for clots. Bolus followed by continuous-infusion intravenous proton pump inhibitor should be used after endoscopic therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 47
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
    Felipe Baracat
    Eduardo Moura
    Wanderley Bernardo
    Leonardo Zorron Pu
    Ernesto Mendonça
    Diogo Moura
    Renato Baracat
    Edson Ide
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 2155 - 2168
  • [2] Endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
    Baracat, Felipe
    Moura, Eduardo
    Bernardo, Wanderley
    Pu, Leonardo Zorron
    Mendonca, Ernesto
    Moura, Diogo
    Baracat, Renato
    Ide, Edson
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (06): : 2155 - 2168
  • [3] Observations, Trials, and Meta-Analyses: The Life Cycle of Evidence-Based Endovascular Therapy COMMENTARY
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
    Abbate, Antonio
    Peruzzi, Mariangela
    Frati, Giacomo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2014, 21 (05) : 693 - 696
  • [4] Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials, Meta-analyses, and Subgroup Analyses
    Sacristan, Jose A.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (13): : 1253 - 1254
  • [5] META-ANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    SACKS, HS
    BERRIER, J
    REITMAN, D
    ANCONABERK, VA
    CHALMERS, TC
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 316 (08): : 450 - 455
  • [6] Evidence for Multiple Micronutrient Effects Based on Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analyses in Developing Countries
    Christian, Parul
    Tielsch, James M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2012, 142 (01): : 173S - 177S
  • [7] Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analyses
    Wallach, Joshua D.
    Sullivan, Patrick G.
    Trepanowski, John F.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 355
  • [8] Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials
    Imperiale, TF
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (01): : 61 - 61
  • [9] Randomized controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses
    Pfeifer, Michael
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2015, 10 (01)
  • [10] Randomized controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses
    Michael Pfeifer
    [J]. Archives of Osteoporosis, 2015, 10