Recommended key performance indicators for operational management of wind turbines

被引:14
|
作者
Pfaffel, S. [1 ]
Faulstich, S. [1 ]
Sheng, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Energy Econ & Energy Syst Technol, Konigstor 59, D-34119 Kassel, Germany
[2] Natl Renewable Energy Lab NREL, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/1356/1/012040
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Operational managers of wind turbines usually monitor a big fleet of turbines and thus need highly condensed information to identify underperforming turbines and to prioritize their work. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are a solid and frequently used tool for this purpose. However, the KPIs used in the wind industry are not unified to date, which makes comparison in the industry difficult. Further, comprehensive standards on a set of KPIs for the wind industry are missing. This article identifies and recommends KPIs and provides detailed definitions to make KPIs comparable and to enable benchmarking. The starting point of this work is an industry survey with 28 participants intended to identify commonly used KPIs, collect various possible definitions, and prioritize them. Out of a total of 50 KPIs, we discuss in a next step 33 selected KPIs on performance, maintenance, and reliability in detail and recommend definitions, most of which are based on international standards. As a result, operators can easily use these recommendations to base their system of KPIs. By using this unified set of KPIs, operators can be well-prepared to conduct industrywide comparisons and benchmarks. The survey and this article will also serve as a basis for committee work of the FGW e.V. to develop a corresponding technical guideline.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technological and Operational Aspects That Limit Small Wind Turbines Performance
    Torres-Madronero, Jose Luis
    Alvarez-Montoya, Joham
    Restrepo-Montoya, Daniel
    Tamayo-Avendano, Jorge Mario
    Nieto-Londono, Cesar
    Sierra-Perez, Julian
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (22)
  • [2] Key performance indicators of OR efficiency. Myths and evidence of key performance indicators in OR management
    Schuster, M.
    Wicha, L. L.
    Fiege, M.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 2007, 56 (03): : 259 - 271
  • [3] Adapted Operational Management of Wind Turbines for the Provision of Primary Power Reserve
    Guenther, Katharina
    Spichartz, Benedikt
    Sourkounis, Constantinos
    [J]. 2021 22ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY (ICIT), 2021, : 552 - 558
  • [4] A taxonomy for key performance indicators management
    Dominguez, Eladio
    Perez, Beatriz
    Rubio, Angel L.
    Zapata, Maria A.
    [J]. COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2019, 64 : 24 - 40
  • [5] Risk Mapping and Key Risk Indicators in Operational Risk Management
    Scandizzo, Sergio
    [J]. ECONOMIC NOTES, 2005, 34 (02) : 231 - 256
  • [6] Operational Risk Assessment of Wind Turbines
    Li, Jian
    Chen, Junsheng
    Sun, Peng
    Li, Hui
    Xie, Kaigui
    Ran, Li
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONDITION MONITORING AND DIAGNOSIS (CMD), 2016, : 14 - 19
  • [7] Operational Conditions Division of Wind Turbines
    Dong Haiying
    Xu Kelei
    Yang Lixia
    Gu Yaoqin
    Chen Ningning
    [J]. 2017 29TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2017, : 6983 - 6988
  • [8] Key Performance Indicators for Wind Farm Operation and Maintenance
    Gonzalez, Elena
    Nanos, Emmanouil M.
    Seyr, Helene
    Valldecabres, Laura
    Yurusen, Nurseda Y.
    Smolka, Ursula
    Muskulus, Michael
    Melero, Julio J.
    [J]. 14TH DEEP SEA OFFSHORE WIND R&D CONFERENCE, EERA DEEPWIND'2017, 2017, 137 : 559 - 570
  • [9] Optimisation of the operational management of wind turbines without fixed feed-in tariffs
    Fischer, Boris
    [J]. AT-AUTOMATISIERUNGSTECHNIK, 2022, 70 (03) : 292 - 299
  • [10] Measuring operational performance of OSH management system - A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators
    Podgorski, Daniel
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 73 : 146 - 166