Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: experimental results versus prediction using non-linear static methods

被引:11
|
作者
Benavent-Climent, Amadeo [1 ]
Escolano-Margarit, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Struct Mech, E-18071 Granada, Spain
关键词
Pushover analysis; Hysteretic damper; N2; method; Capacity spectrum method; Displacement coefficient method;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-012-9375-6
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The use of seismic hysteretic dampers for passive control is increasing exponentially in recent years for both new and existing buildings. In order to utilize hysteretic dampers within a structural system, it is of paramount importance to have simplified design procedures based upon knowledge gained from theoretical studies and validated with experimental results. Non-linear Static Procedures (NSPs) are presented as an alternative to the force-based methods more common nowadays. The application of NSPs to conventional structures has been well established; yet there is a lack of experimental information on how NSPs apply to systems with hysteretic dampers. In this research, several shaking table tests were conducted on two single bay and single story 1:2 scale structures with and without hysteretic dampers. The maximum response of the structure with dampers in terms of lateral displacement and base shear obtained from the tests was compared with the prediction provided by three well-known NSPs: (1) the improved version of the Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM) from FEMA 440; (2) the improved version of the Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) from FEMA 440; and (3) the N2 Method implemented in Eurocode 8. In general, the improved version of the DCM and N2 methods are found to provide acceptable accuracy in prediction, but the CSM tends to underestimate the response.
引用
收藏
页码:1857 / 1883
页数:27
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: experimental results versus prediction using non-linear static methods
    Amadeo Benavent-Climent
    David Escolano-Margarit
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 10 : 1857 - 1883
  • [2] Nonlinear static methods vs. experimental shaking table test results
    Cardone, Donatello
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2007, 11 (06) : 847 - 875
  • [3] On-line identification of non-linear hysteretic structures using an adaptive tracking technique
    Yang, JN
    Lin, SL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 2004, 39 (09) : 1481 - 1491
  • [4] Robust design of non-linear structures using optimization methods
    Doltsinis, I
    Kang, Z
    Cheng, GD
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2005, 194 (12-16) : 1779 - 1795
  • [5] Non-linear simulation of shaking-table tests on 3-and 7-storey X-Lam timber buildings
    Rinaldin, G.
    Fragiacomo, M.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 113 : 133 - 148
  • [6] Experimental Results between Non-Linear and Linear Precoding Using Multiuser MIMO Testbed
    Matsumoto, Tomoko
    Hatakawa, Yasuyuki
    Kitagawa, Koichiro
    Konishi, Satoshi
    2013 IEEE 77TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC SPRING), 2013,
  • [7] Evaluation of the structural response under seismic actions using non-linear static methods
    Fragiacomo, M.
    Amadio, C.
    Rajgelj, S.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2006, 35 (12): : 1511 - 1531
  • [8] SAFETY FORMAT AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR ANALYSIS OF MARINE STRUCTURES USING NON-LINEAR METHODS
    Solland, Gunnar
    Johansen, Atle
    Sigurdsson, Gudfinnur
    OMAE2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, VOL 3: MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, 2011, : 687 - 694
  • [9] Efficient transient dynamic analysis of a crane bridge subjected to shake table tests using non-linear substructuring
    Li, Sijia
    Brun, Michael
    Gravouil, Anthony
    MECHANICS & INDUSTRY, 2025, 26
  • [10] Structural and non-structural numerical blind prediction of shaking table experimental tests on fixed-base and base-isolated hospitals
    Mazza, Fabio
    Donnici, Angelo
    Labernarda, Rodolfo
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2024, 53 (10): : 2961 - 2987